All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpuidle: move enter_dead to the driver structure
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 13:05:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF6C673.7000003@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201207052240.57686.rjw@sisk.pl>

On 07/05/2012 10:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The 'enter_dead' function is only used for processor_idle.c
>> and the same function is used several times. We fall into the
>> same abuse with the multiple callbacks for the same function.
> 
> This isn't abuse, mind you.  This is a normal practice.

Well, that depends :)

I agree adding a callback per state is nice and flexible but if it is
not used, it is a waste of memory, even if it is 32 bytes.

>> This patch fixes that by moving the 'enter_dead' function to the
>> driver structure. A flag CPUIDLE_FLAG_DEAD_VALID has been added
>> to handle the callback conditional invokation.
> 
> And how does that improve things?

In order to check if the play_dead is enabled for a specific state, we
check if the pointer is set. As it has been moved to a single function,
we need to add a flag to replace this check. That is not an improvement,
it replace a check by another check.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-06 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-05 13:23 [PATCH 1/4] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:38   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 10:58     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-10  8:29       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-10 11:39         ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-10 12:38           ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuidle: move enter_dead to " Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 11:05     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-07-06 21:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuidle : move tlb flag to the cpuidle header Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 11:07     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FF6C673.7000003@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.