All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajendra Nayak <rajendra.nayak@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:59:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFBE7E3.8020809@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FF6C4C1.7030004@linaro.org>

Hi Daniel,

On Friday 06 July 2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The main purpose of all these cleanup patches are to move out all
> non-data information from the cpuidle_state structure in order to add a
> new api which could be 'cpuidle_register_cpu_latency(int cpu, struct
> cpuidle_latencies latencies)'.

So are there any technical difficulties in adding such an api with the
non-data information being part of cpuidle_state? Or its just that you
think the already duplicated non-data information (per state) is going
to be duplicated much more (per state per cpu) in most cases.

regards,
Rajendra


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-10  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-05 13:23 [PATCH 1/4] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:38   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 10:58     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:23       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-10  8:29       ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-07-10 11:39         ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-10 12:38           ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuidle: move enter_dead to " Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:40   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 11:05     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuidle : move tlb flag to the cpuidle header Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-05 20:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-06 11:07     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-07-06 21:29       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-05 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] acpi: intel_idle : break dependency between modules Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFBE7E3.8020809@linaro.org \
    --to=rajendra.nayak@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.