From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix suspicious RCU originating from cpu_die()
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:04:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF752DE.7000104@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120706203005.GF31508@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 07/06/12 13:30, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:39:09AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 07/05/12 17:24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:45:58PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> @@ -179,7 +184,7 @@ void __ref cpu_die(void)
>>>> mb();
>>>>
>>>> /* Tell __cpu_die() that this CPU is now safe to dispose of */
>>>> - complete(&cpu_died);
>>>> + __this_cpu_write(cpu_state, CPU_DEAD);
>>> Or you could do something like:
>>>
>>> RCU_NONIDLE(complete(&cpu_died));
>>>
>>> This would tell RCU that it needed to pay attention to this CPU for
>>> the duration of the "complete()" function call despite the CPU's being
>>> idle. And might allow you to dispense with the rest of the patch.
>> Great! I like that more since we get to keep the completion mechanism
>> instead of a busy wait.
>>
>> Russell, which one would you prefer? Here's the other version
> I think I prefer the version below.
>
Ok. I put it in the patch tracker.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix suspicious RCU originating from cpu_die()
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:04:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF752DE.7000104@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120706203005.GF31508@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 07/06/12 13:30, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:39:09AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 07/05/12 17:24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:45:58PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> @@ -179,7 +184,7 @@ void __ref cpu_die(void)
>>>> mb();
>>>>
>>>> /* Tell __cpu_die() that this CPU is now safe to dispose of */
>>>> - complete(&cpu_died);
>>>> + __this_cpu_write(cpu_state, CPU_DEAD);
>>> Or you could do something like:
>>>
>>> RCU_NONIDLE(complete(&cpu_died));
>>>
>>> This would tell RCU that it needed to pay attention to this CPU for
>>> the duration of the "complete()" function call despite the CPU's being
>>> idle. And might allow you to dispense with the rest of the patch.
>> Great! I like that more since we get to keep the completion mechanism
>> instead of a busy wait.
>>
>> Russell, which one would you prefer? Here's the other version
> I think I prefer the version below.
>
Ok. I put it in the patch tracker.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-06 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-05 23:45 [PATCH] ARM: smp: Fix suspicious RCU originating from cpu_die() Stephen Boyd
2012-07-05 23:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-06 0:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-06 0:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-06 18:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-06 18:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-07-06 20:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-06 20:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-06 21:04 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2012-07-06 21:04 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF752DE.7000104@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.