Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: mem_cgroup_relize_xxx_limit can guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit

[Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>]

(2012/07/06 12:21), Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>

Could you merge all 'commentary fixes' into a patch ?


> ---
>   mm/memcontrol.c |    4 ++--
>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4b64fe0..a501660 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3418,7 +3418,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   		/*
>   		 * Rather than hide all in some function, I do this in
>   		 * open coded manner. You see what this really does.
> -		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit < memcg->memsw.limit.
> +		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
>   		 */
>   		mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
>   		memswlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_LIMIT);
> @@ -3479,7 +3479,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>   		/*
>   		 * Rather than hide all in some function, I do this in
>   		 * open coded manner. You see what this really does.
> -		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit < memcg->memsw.limit.
> +		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
>   		 */
>   		mutex_lock(&set_limit_mutex);
>   		memlimit = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_LIMIT);
>