All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/p2m: Optimize the get_phys_to_machine function a bit.
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:41:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFAFBA4.4050603@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341330038-21686-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>

On 03/07/12 16:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Running perf tells me that the check for p2m_identity
> is done a lot - more than it should.

This patch doesn't change the how often the check is done.  Is this just
bad wording of the description?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/p2m.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> index 64effdc..161bcdc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ unsigned long get_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn)
>  	 * and in p2m_*missing, so returning the INVALID_P2M_ENTRY
>  	 * would be wrong.
>  	 */
> -	if (p2m_top[topidx][mididx] == p2m_identity)
> +	if (unlikely(p2m_top[topidx][mididx] == p2m_identity))
>  		return IDENTITY_FRAME(pfn);
>  
>  	return p2m_top[topidx][mididx][idx];


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen/p2m: Optimize the get_phys_to_machine function a bit.
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:41:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFAFBA4.4050603@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341330038-21686-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>

On 03/07/12 16:40, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Running perf tells me that the check for p2m_identity
> is done a lot - more than it should.

This patch doesn't change the how often the check is done.  Is this just
bad wording of the description?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/xen/p2m.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> index 64effdc..161bcdc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ unsigned long get_phys_to_machine(unsigned long pfn)
>  	 * and in p2m_*missing, so returning the INVALID_P2M_ENTRY
>  	 * would be wrong.
>  	 */
> -	if (p2m_top[topidx][mididx] == p2m_identity)
> +	if (unlikely(p2m_top[topidx][mididx] == p2m_identity))
>  		return IDENTITY_FRAME(pfn);
>  
>  	return p2m_top[topidx][mididx][idx];

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-09 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-03 15:40 [PATCH] various Xen fixes for v3.6 (v1) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] xen/p2m: Optimize the get_phys_to_machine function a bit Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-09 15:41   ` David Vrabel [this message]
2012-07-09 15:41     ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2012-07-09 16:14     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] xen/perf: Define .glob for the different hypercalls Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 16:07   ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-07-03 17:38     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 17:38     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 16:07   ` Jan Beulich
2012-07-03 16:14   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2012-07-03 16:14     ` David Vrabel
2012-07-03 16:17   ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-03 17:44     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] xen/acpi: Fix potential memory leak Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] xen/hvc: Fix up checks when the info is allocated Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 16:11   ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2012-07-03 17:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 17:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-03 16:11   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FFAFBA4.4050603@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.