From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c: fix threaded IRQ to use IRQF_ONESHOT
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:32:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFBDA85.8070708@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120709151527.58f44c3a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 07/10/2012 12:15 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 09:33:54 -0700
> Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> Requesting a threaded interrupt without a primary handler and without
>> IRQF_ONESHOT is dangerous, and after commit 1c6c6952 (genirq: Reject
>> bogus threaded irq requests), these requests are rejected. This
>> causes ->probe() to fail, and the RTC driver not to be availble.
>>
>> To fix, add IRQF_ONESHOT to the IRQ flags.
>>
>> Tested on OMAP3730/OveroSTORM and OMAP4430/Panda board using rtcwake
>> to wake from system suspend multiple times.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Resending to broader audience and including Andrew. Since, I understand
>> that drivers/rtc is somewhat orphaned, Andrew, can you queue this fix for
>> v3.5. Thanks.
>>
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> index 258abea..c5d06fe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static int __devinit twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, twl_rtc_interrupt,
>> - IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> dev_name(&rtc->dev), rtc);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ is not free.\n");
>
> OK, this is the second such patch I've seen and it's time to wonder if
> we should get grumpy at tglx. afacit 1c6c6952 broke the following
> drivers:
If you want to be grumpy, be grumpy at Linus. Thomas actually posted a patch
which just emits a warning, instead of failing to request the IRQ, but Linus
didn't want to take it. The whole thread is here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/12/151
>
>
> sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> sound/soc/codecs/max98095.c
> sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
> drivers/usb/otg/ab8500-usb.c
> drivers/usb/otg/twl4030-usb.c
> drivers/gpio/gpio-sx150x.c
> drivers/gpio/gpio-ab8500.c
> drivers/mfd/ab8500-gpadc.c
> drivers/mfd/ti-ssp.c
> drivers/mfd/twl4030-madc.c
> drivers/mfd/htc-i2cpld.c
> drivers/mfd/wm831x-auxadc.c
> drivers/mfd/twl6040-core.c
> drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c
> drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c
> drivers/mmc/host/of_mmc_spi.c
> drivers/mmc/core/cd-gpio.c
> drivers/net/can/mcp251x.c
> drivers/nfc/pn544_hci.c
> drivers/nfc/pn544.c
> drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c
> drivers/power/twl4030_charger.c
> drivers/power/lp8727_charger.c
> drivers/power/smb347-charger.c
> drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> drivers/power/wm831x_power.c
> drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c
> drivers/power/max8903_charger.c
> drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c
> drivers/regulator/wm831x-isink.c
> drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c
> drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c
> drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/adt7310.c
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/adt7410.c
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c
> drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
> drivers/staging/iio/accel/sca3000_core.c
> drivers/staging/cptm1217/clearpad_tm1217.c
> drivers/input/keyboard/tc3589x-keypad.c
> drivers/input/keyboard/twl4030_keypad.c
> drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c
> drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> drivers/input/misc/wm831x-on.c
> drivers/media/radio/si470x/radio-si470x-i2c.c
> drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-wm831x.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-max8998.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-isl1208.c
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_mid_powerbtn.c
> include/linux/mfd/wm8994/core.h
> include/linux/mfd/wm8350/core.h
>
> what am I missing here?
>
Most of these drivers are not broken (anymore), the majority drivers which
were broken by Thomas's patch have already been fixed. As for your list:
I've already sent out a fix for all of the staging/iio/ drivers a couple of
days ago. And drivers which use nested interrupts are not affected by this
problem. In your list these are basically all drivers with wm*, twl* and
ab8500 in their names. But still leaves a handful of broken driver which
should be fixed.
- Lars
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lars@metafoo.de (Lars-Peter Clausen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c: fix threaded IRQ to use IRQF_ONESHOT
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:32:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFBDA85.8070708@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120709151527.58f44c3a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 07/10/2012 12:15 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 09:33:54 -0700
> Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> Requesting a threaded interrupt without a primary handler and without
>> IRQF_ONESHOT is dangerous, and after commit 1c6c6952 (genirq: Reject
>> bogus threaded irq requests), these requests are rejected. This
>> causes ->probe() to fail, and the RTC driver not to be availble.
>>
>> To fix, add IRQF_ONESHOT to the IRQ flags.
>>
>> Tested on OMAP3730/OveroSTORM and OMAP4430/Panda board using rtcwake
>> to wake from system suspend multiple times.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Resending to broader audience and including Andrew. Since, I understand
>> that drivers/rtc is somewhat orphaned, Andrew, can you queue this fix for
>> v3.5. Thanks.
>>
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> index 258abea..c5d06fe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static int __devinit twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, twl_rtc_interrupt,
>> - IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> dev_name(&rtc->dev), rtc);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ is not free.\n");
>
> OK, this is the second such patch I've seen and it's time to wonder if
> we should get grumpy at tglx. afacit 1c6c6952 broke the following
> drivers:
If you want to be grumpy, be grumpy at Linus. Thomas actually posted a patch
which just emits a warning, instead of failing to request the IRQ, but Linus
didn't want to take it. The whole thread is here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/12/151
>
>
> sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> sound/soc/codecs/max98095.c
> sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
> drivers/usb/otg/ab8500-usb.c
> drivers/usb/otg/twl4030-usb.c
> drivers/gpio/gpio-sx150x.c
> drivers/gpio/gpio-ab8500.c
> drivers/mfd/ab8500-gpadc.c
> drivers/mfd/ti-ssp.c
> drivers/mfd/twl4030-madc.c
> drivers/mfd/htc-i2cpld.c
> drivers/mfd/wm831x-auxadc.c
> drivers/mfd/twl6040-core.c
> drivers/mfd/wm8350-core.c
> drivers/extcon/extcon-max8997.c
> drivers/mmc/host/of_mmc_spi.c
> drivers/mmc/core/cd-gpio.c
> drivers/net/can/mcp251x.c
> drivers/nfc/pn544_hci.c
> drivers/nfc/pn544.c
> drivers/power/ab8500_btemp.c
> drivers/power/twl4030_charger.c
> drivers/power/lp8727_charger.c
> drivers/power/smb347-charger.c
> drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> drivers/power/wm831x_power.c
> drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c
> drivers/power/max8903_charger.c
> drivers/power/ab8500_charger.c
> drivers/regulator/wm831x-isink.c
> drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c
> drivers/regulator/wm831x-dcdc.c
> drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/adt7310.c
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/adt7410.c
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7816.c
> drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7150.c
> drivers/staging/iio/accel/sca3000_core.c
> drivers/staging/cptm1217/clearpad_tm1217.c
> drivers/input/keyboard/tc3589x-keypad.c
> drivers/input/keyboard/twl4030_keypad.c
> drivers/input/misc/twl4030-pwrbutton.c
> drivers/input/misc/twl6040-vibra.c
> drivers/input/misc/wm831x-on.c
> drivers/media/radio/si470x/radio-si470x-i2c.c
> drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-wm831x.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-max8998.c
> drivers/rtc/rtc-isl1208.c
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_mid_powerbtn.c
> include/linux/mfd/wm8994/core.h
> include/linux/mfd/wm8350/core.h
>
> what am I missing here?
>
Most of these drivers are not broken (anymore), the majority drivers which
were broken by Thomas's patch have already been fixed. As for your list:
I've already sent out a fix for all of the staging/iio/ drivers a couple of
days ago. And drivers which use nested interrupts are not affected by this
problem. In your list these are basically all drivers with wm*, twl* and
ab8500 in their names. But still leaves a handful of broken driver which
should be fixed.
- Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-06 16:33 [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c: fix threaded IRQ to use IRQF_ONESHOT Kevin Hilman
2012-07-06 16:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-07-09 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-09 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-10 7:32 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2012-07-10 7:32 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-07-10 11:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-10 11:54 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-28 16:17 Kevin Hilman
2012-06-28 16:17 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-07-06 14:25 ` Hilman, Kevin
2012-07-06 14:25 ` Hilman, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFBDA85.8070708@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.