Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree

[Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>]

On 07/13/12 01:16, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:13:37PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> On 12 July 2012 18:32, Mark Brown<broonie-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>  wrote:
>
>>> Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal...  However, Thomas
>>> mentioned that in order to test this he merged the SPI tree into your
>>> tree so perhaps there is also a dependency on the SPI tree?  If that was
>>> just for good practice testing then I agree that the best thing is to
>>> merge via your tree, otherwise we might need to think harder.
>
>> There were no dependency on Grant's spi/next branch. It was merged
>> just to ensure that nothing is broken.
>
> OK, great - then the Samsung tree it is.

Thanks, will apply.

Mark, if you want to add your ack or review on them, let me know.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/