All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Jean Delvare" <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	"Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	"Yazen Ghannam" <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Shyam Sundar S K" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
	"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:I2C/SMBUS CONTROLLER DRIVERS FOR PC"
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:AMD PMC DRIVER" <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/CPU/AMD: Print the reason for the last reset
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:32:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bf62335-2e67-43c5-b2dc-4b0bed0521ed@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250430192538.GGaBJ5MuS4CEKa4kIX@fat_crate.local>

On 4/30/2025 2:25 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 02:17:43PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> Well with that approach once you got a known bit set you broke the loop and
>> would print a message for that known bit.  But if you have two bits set you
>> either need another loop or you only get one message print.
> 
> So I gather you want to print for *each* set bit?
> 
> If so:
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i <= ARRAY_SIZE(s5_reset_reason_txt); i++) {
> 		if (!(value & BIT(i)))
> 			continue;
> 
> 		if (s5_reset_reason_txt[i])
> 			pr_info(...);
> 	}
> 
> Still a lot easier instead of calling some function and dealing with from
> which bit to start etc etc.
> 
> 

This would work, but would still need to track if "no" known bits were 
set to emit an "unknown" message.

So the loops end up being for() and check a bit or while (true) and 
find_next_bit() and otherwise identical.

At that point does it really buy much more than the while (true) 
approach and find_next_bit()?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-30 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-22 23:48 [PATCH v5 0/5] AMD Zen debugging documentation Mario Limonciello
2025-04-22 23:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: Add AMD Zen debugging document Mario Limonciello
2025-05-02  9:36   ` [tip: x86/platform] " tip-bot2 for Mario Limonciello
2025-04-22 23:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] i2c: piix4: Depends on X86 Mario Limonciello
2025-04-24 16:24   ` [tip: x86/platform] i2c: piix4: Make CONFIG_I2C_PIIX4 dependent on CONFIG_X86 tip-bot2 for Mario Limonciello
2025-04-25 11:18   ` [PATCH v5 2/5] i2c: piix4: Depends on X86 Andi Shyti
2025-04-26  9:42     ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-28 18:18       ` Andi Shyti
2025-04-26  9:57   ` [tip: x86/platform] i2c: piix4: Make CONFIG_I2C_PIIX4 dependent on CONFIG_X86 tip-bot2 for Mario Limonciello
2025-06-10  9:16   ` [PATCH v5 2/5] i2c: piix4: Depends on X86 Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-10  9:24     ` Huacai Chen
2025-06-10 14:12       ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-10 14:53         ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-10 14:55           ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-10 16:59             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-10 18:52               ` Hans de Goede
2025-04-22 23:48 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] i2c: piix4: Move SB800_PIIX4_FCH_PM_ADDR definition to amd/fch.h Mario Limonciello
2025-04-24 16:24   ` [tip: x86/platform] i2c: piix4, x86/platform: Move the SB800 PIIX4 FCH definitions to <asm/amd/fch.h> tip-bot2 for Mario Limonciello
2025-04-25 11:18   ` [PATCH v5 3/5] i2c: piix4: Move SB800_PIIX4_FCH_PM_ADDR definition to amd/fch.h Andi Shyti
2025-04-26  9:57   ` [tip: x86/platform] i2c: piix4, x86/platform: Move the SB800 PIIX4 FCH definitions to <asm/amd/fch.h> tip-bot2 for Mario Limonciello
2025-04-22 23:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] platform/x86/amd: pmc: use FCH_PM_BASE definition Mario Limonciello
2025-04-24 16:24   ` [tip: x86/platform] platform/x86/amd/pmc: Use " tip-bot2 for Mario Limonciello
2025-04-26  9:56   ` tip-bot2 for Mario Limonciello
2025-04-29 14:39   ` [PATCH v5 4/5] platform/x86/amd: pmc: use " Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-22 23:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] x86/CPU/AMD: Print the reason for the last reset Mario Limonciello
2025-04-30 19:03   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-30 19:05     ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-30 19:10       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-30 19:17         ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-30 19:25           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-30 19:32             ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-04-30 19:38               ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-01  8:31               ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-04  6:38                 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-02  9:36   ` [tip: x86/platform] " tip-bot2 for Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-04  6:37     ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-04  7:03       ` [PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD: Clean up the last-reset printing code a bit Ingo Molnar
2025-05-04  9:52         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-04 18:08           ` Mario Limonciello
2025-05-05  5:32         ` [tip: x86/platform] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-05 14:12   ` [tip: x86/platform] x86/CPU/AMD: Print the reason for the last reset tip-bot2 for Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-23 15:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] AMD Zen debugging documentation Jonathan Corbet
2025-04-28 16:14   ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-24 15:58 ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4bf62335-2e67-43c5-b2dc-4b0bed0521ed@kernel.org \
    --to=superm1@kernel.org \
    --cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.