From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] drm/xe: Abstract the initial FB PTE checks a bit
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:48:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4cc2bd3086c250786df3a059cec22921242575d9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511214122.8468-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 12 May 2026, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Add a few helpers that allow us to abstract the xe initial FB PTE
> check a bit. Still very ad-hoc compared to the nicely abstracted
> i915 counterpart, but whatever.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> index b7e0685351bb..0dabc5709d01 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> @@ -18,8 +18,19 @@
> #include "xe_fb_pin.h"
> #include "xe_ggtt.h"
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
> +#include "xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.h"
Not sure how this is related to the changes here.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> #include "xe_vram_types.h"
>
> +static bool is_pte_local(u64 pte)
> +{
> + return pte & XE_GGTT_PTE_DM;
> +}
> +
> +static bool need_pte_local(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + return IS_DGFX(xe);
> +}
> +
> static struct xe_bo *
> initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
> struct intel_initial_plane_config *plane_config)
> @@ -43,13 +54,13 @@ initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
> if (IS_DGFX(xe)) {
> u64 pte = xe_ggtt_read_pte(tile0->mem.ggtt, base);
>
> - if (!(pte & XE_GGTT_PTE_DM)) {
> - drm_err(&xe->drm,
> - "Initial plane programming missing DM bit\n");
> + if (is_pte_local(pte) != need_pte_local(xe)) {
> + drm_err(&xe->drm, "Initial plane PTE has bad local memory bit\n");
> return NULL;
> }
>
> phys_base = pte & ~(page_size - 1);
> +
> flags |= XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM0;
>
> /*
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 21:41 [PATCH 00/14] drm/{i915,xe}: BIOS FB takeover fixes Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Disable the plane if initial plane config readout failed Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/fbdev: Extract bios_fb_ok() Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Throw away the BIOS fb if has the wrong depth/bpp Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Introduce intel_bo_fbdev_bios_fb_ok() Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Use drm_dbg_kms() for initial FB debugs Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:40 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/xe: Do the initial FB size alignment earlier Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/xe/ggtt: Decouple lmem/stolen physcial offset from GGTT offset Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/xe: Print a debug message if we have no stolen for the initial FB Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:45 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/xe: Abstract the initial FB PTE checks a bit Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:48 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/xe: Check the PTE local memory bit for initial FB in stolen Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/xe: s/bar2/lmembar/ Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:49 ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/xe: Use the correct stolen offset in initial FB readout Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Fix BIOS FB memory region name debug prints Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Print the phys_base in addition to the dma_addr for the BIOS FB Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 22:27 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/{i915,xe}: BIOS FB takeover fixes Patchwork
2026-05-12 7:02 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-05-12 9:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2026-05-12 10:12 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-12 18:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4cc2bd3086c250786df3a059cec22921242575d9@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.