All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] drm/xe: Print a debug message if we have no stolen for the initial FB
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:45:41 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7fc052011cc1525083eb509f9dd88e78bdf5464@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511214122.8468-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 12 May 2026, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Inform the poor sop reading the logs why the initial FB was rejected
> if there is no stolen memory.
>
> Technically this should perhaps be an error since the plane is known
> to be enabled at this point, and if there is no stolen then it clearly
> can't be scanning out from anywhere. But maybe there are some
> virtualization passthrough cases and whatnot where we might not be
> able to get access to stolen, so keep it as debug (same as i915).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> index 14ac4cd8b7ff..b7e0685351bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_initial_plane.c
> @@ -67,10 +67,14 @@ initial_plane_bo(struct xe_device *xe,
>  			    "Using phys_base=%pa, based on initial plane programming\n",
>  			    &phys_base);
>  	} else {
> -		struct ttm_resource_manager *stolen = ttm_manager_type(&xe->ttm, XE_PL_STOLEN);
> +		struct ttm_resource_manager *stolen;
>  
> -		if (!stolen)
> +		stolen = ttm_manager_type(&xe->ttm, XE_PL_STOLEN);
> +		if (!stolen) {
> +			drm_dbg_kms(&xe->drm, "No stolen for initial FB\n");
>  			return NULL;
> +		}
> +
>  		phys_base = base;
>  		flags |= XE_BO_FLAG_STOLEN;
>  	}

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 21:41 [PATCH 00/14] drm/{i915,xe}: BIOS FB takeover fixes Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915: Disable the plane if initial plane config readout failed Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:25   ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/fbdev: Extract bios_fb_ok() Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:29   ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915: Throw away the BIOS fb if has the wrong depth/bpp Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:33   ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915: Introduce intel_bo_fbdev_bios_fb_ok() Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915: Use drm_dbg_kms() for initial FB debugs Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:40   ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/xe: Do the initial FB size alignment earlier Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/xe/ggtt: Decouple lmem/stolen physcial offset from GGTT offset Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/xe: Print a debug message if we have no stolen for the initial FB Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:45   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/xe: Abstract the initial FB PTE checks a bit Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:48   ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/xe: Check the PTE local memory bit for initial FB in stolen Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/xe: s/bar2/lmembar/ Ville Syrjala
2026-05-12 10:49   ` Jani Nikula
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/xe: Use the correct stolen offset in initial FB readout Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915: Fix BIOS FB memory region name debug prints Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 21:41 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915: Print the phys_base in addition to the dma_addr for the BIOS FB Ville Syrjala
2026-05-11 22:27 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/{i915,xe}: BIOS FB takeover fixes Patchwork
2026-05-12  7:02 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-05-12  9:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2026-05-12 10:12 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-12 18:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7fc052011cc1525083eb509f9dd88e78bdf5464@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.