Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-binding: ARM: samsung: Add Samsung Exynos8855

[Ivaylo Ivanov <ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com>]

On 6/27/26 20:12, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Add Samsung Exynos8855 smdk board to documentation
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/samsung-boards.yaml     | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/samsung-boards.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/samsung-boards.yaml
> index 753b3ba1b607..273464400477 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/samsung-boards.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/samsung-boards.yaml
> @@ -235,6 +235,12 @@ properties:
>                - winlink,e850-96                 # WinLink E850-96
>            - const: samsung,exynos850
>  
> +      - description: Exynos8855 based boards
> +        items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - samsung,exynos8855-smdk         # Samsung SMDK
> +          - const: samsung,exynos8855

Is there any particular reason for using "exynos8855" rather than the commercial
name - exynos1580? We've already established using the latter naming scheme as a
convention (e.g. exynos3830 -> exynos850, exynos9830 -> exynos990) rather than
the development model numbers, so I don't think breaking that will help anyone
with the already painful model number confusion.

Best regards,
Ivaylo

> +
>        - description: Exynos8895 based boards
>          items:
>            - enum: