iptables dnat, ebtables, mark

iptables dnat, ebtables, mark

[Moritz Gartenmeister]

hi

my idea:
i know the mac-adress from a compromised computer in my lan. i want to redirect all the traffic from 
this computer to a webserver (to show up a page with e.g. "bad guy! you got a virus").

my system:
debian testing 2.6.7
iptables
ebtables
bridge-code

my solution so far:
ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s $MAC -j mark --set-mark 8 --mark-target CONTINUE
there are no other rules in this chain.
some more rules in -A FORWARD all with -s macadress, but not the one above.

is the only rule in prerouting nat.
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j DNAT --to-destination $IP-WWW

is the first role in the mangle chain.
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j ACCEPT

one check rule in mangl POSTROUTING
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m -mark --makr 0x8 -j LOG --log-prefix IPT_MARK

my problem:
the user can access the webserver and only this server, but the user is not redirected to the 
web-server, if he tries to access e.g. www.google.com. he only get an error-message.

my observation:
number of packets differ...
ebtables 213 packets
prerouting mangle 200 packets
prerouting nat 118 packets
postrouting mangle 93 packets

any explanations? the number should be at least the same. i don't understand this. the filter-rules 
seem to work properly...

cheers
moritz

iptables dnat, ebtables, mark

[Moritz Gartenmeister]

hi

my idea:
i know the mac-adress from a compromised computer in my lan. i want to redirect all the traffic from
this computer to a webserver (to show up a page with e.g. "bad guy! you got a virus").

my system:
debian testing 2.6.7
iptables
ebtables
bridge-code

my solution so far:
ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s $MAC -j mark --set-mark 8 --mark-target CONTINUE
there are no other rules in this chain.
some more rules in -A FORWARD all with -s macadress, but not the one above.

is the only rule in prerouting nat.
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j DNAT --to-destination $IP-WWW

is the first role in the mangle chain.
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j ACCEPT

one check rule in mangl POSTROUTING
iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m -mark --makr 0x8 -j LOG --log-prefix IPT_MARK

my problem:
the user can access the webserver and only this server, but the user is not redirected to the
web-server, if he tries to access e.g. www.google.com. he only get an error-message.

my observation:
number of packets differ...
ebtables 213 packets
prerouting mangle 200 packets
prerouting nat 118 packets
postrouting mangle 93 packets

any explanations? the number should be at least the same. i don't understand this. the filter-rules
seem to work properly...

cheers
moritz


-- 
Uplink student association
Moritz Gartenmeister
Bülachstrasse 1 F
8057 Zürich
Switzerland

Re: iptables dnat, ebtables, mark

[Jason Opperisano]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Moritz Gartenmeister wrote:
> hi
> 
> my idea:
> i know the mac-adress from a compromised computer in my lan. i want to 
> redirect all the traffic from
> this computer to a webserver (to show up a page with e.g. "bad guy! you got 
> a virus").
> 
> my system:
> debian testing 2.6.7
> iptables
> ebtables
> bridge-code
> 
> my solution so far:
> ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s $MAC -j mark --set-mark 8 --mark-target 
> CONTINUE
> there are no other rules in this chain.
> some more rules in -A FORWARD all with -s macadress, but not the one above.
> 
> is the only rule in prerouting nat.
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j DNAT --to-destination 
> $IP-WWW
> 
> is the first role in the mangle chain.
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j ACCEPT

are you filtering packets in MANGLE?

> one check rule in mangl POSTROUTING
> iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m -mark --makr 0x8 -j LOG --log-prefix 
> IPT_MARK

are you getting logs out of this rule?  if so--do the src/dst IP's look
like they should?

> my problem:
> the user can access the webserver and only this server, but the user is not 
> redirected to the
> web-server, if he tries to access e.g. www.google.com. he only get an 
> error-message.
> 
> my observation:
> number of packets differ...
> ebtables 213 packets
> prerouting mangle 200 packets
> prerouting nat 118 packets
> postrouting mangle 93 packets
> 
> any explanations? the number should be at least the same. i don't 
> understand this. the filter-rules
> seem to work properly...

i think you need to describe the relative locations of the client,
bridge, and web server.

it sounds like it could be a routing problem.

-j

--
"I've always wondered if there was a god. And now I know there is --
 and it's me."
        --The Simpsons

Re: iptables dnat, ebtables, mark

[Moritz Gartenmeister]

Jason Opperisano wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Moritz Gartenmeister wrote:
> 

>>is the first role in the mangle chain.
>>iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j ACCEPT
> 
> 
> are you filtering packets in MANGLE?

yes i do, but i don't drop packets, except malformed packets (like: if the packet is coming from 
inside, then it must have an ip from the private net 172.17.0.0/16, else drop).

and i use mark to classify packets:
mark 2 for all p2p-packets
mark 3 for all http-packets
and so on... (none with 8)

this marks are used later for tc.

> 
>>one check rule in mangl POSTROUTING
>>iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m -mark --makr 0x8 -j LOG --log-prefix 
>>IPT_MARK
> 
> 
> are you getting logs out of this rule?  if so--do the src/dst IP's look
> like they should?

yes they do. but i think, that not all packets are dnatted, although they are correctly marked.

>>my observation:
>>number of packets differ...
>>ebtables 213 packets
>>prerouting mangle 200 packets

this numbers should be the same, because there is no rule between.

>>prerouting nat 118 packets
>>postrouting mangle 93 packets
>>
>>any explanations? the number should be at least the same. i don't 
>>understand this. the filter-rules
>>seem to work properly...
> 
> 
> i think you need to describe the relative locations of the client,
> bridge, and web server.

users -- filter-server -- switch -- gw
                              |
                              |
                          webserver



> it sounds like it could be a routing problem.

hm... this is the only connection, which is routed. the rest of the traffic is just marked and 
shaped with tc.

moritz
-- 
Uplink student association
Moritz Gartenmeister
Bülachstrasse 1 F
8057 Zürich
Switzerland

Re: iptables dnat, ebtables, mark

[Josh Nerius]

I have been experimenting with a very similar setup and have found
that in order to DNAT traffic transparently coming through the bridge,
it was necessary to set an ip address on the virtual bridge interface
and appropriate routes.

I haven't needed to use ebtables up to this point...Here is a rule
that I've used that I've had some luck with.

iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -m physdev --physdev-in $IN_INT -m mac
--mac-source $MAC -j DNAT --to $WEBSERVER

Make sure to properly set the physdev interface. Though this isn't
entirely necessary, I've seen weird things happen without it.

It is important that the site you're DNATing to doesn't require host
headers as this has seemingly caused issues.

Another approach I'm experimenting with is DNATing dns requests
instead to a server set for the purpose of resolving everything to a
particular ip and then dropping all other traffic from that customer
that's not either destined for the dns server or the web server that
you're directing them to.

Let me know if this helps.

Josh Nerius

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:42:46 +0100, Moritz Gartenmeister
<moritz@uplink-verein.ch> wrote:
> hi
> 
> my idea:
> i know the mac-adress from a compromised computer in my lan. i want to redirect all the traffic from
> this computer to a webserver (to show up a page with e.g. "bad guy! you got a virus").
> 
> my system:
> debian testing 2.6.7
> iptables
> ebtables
> bridge-code
> 
> my solution so far:
> ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s $MAC -j mark --set-mark 8 --mark-target CONTINUE
> there are no other rules in this chain.
> some more rules in -A FORWARD all with -s macadress, but not the one above.
> 
> is the only rule in prerouting nat.
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j DNAT --to-destination $IP-WWW
> 
> is the first role in the mangle chain.
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j ACCEPT
> 
> one check rule in mangl POSTROUTING
> iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m -mark --makr 0x8 -j LOG --log-prefix IPT_MARK
> 
> my problem:
> the user can access the webserver and only this server, but the user is not redirected to the
> web-server, if he tries to access e.g. www.google.com. he only get an error-message.
> 
> my observation:
> number of packets differ...
> ebtables 213 packets
> prerouting mangle 200 packets
> prerouting nat 118 packets
> postrouting mangle 93 packets
> 
> any explanations? the number should be at least the same. i don't understand this. the filter-rules
> seem to work properly...
> 
> cheers
> moritz
> 
> --
> Uplink student association
> Moritz Gartenmeister
> Bülachstrasse 1 F
> 8057 Zürich
> Switzerland
> 
> 


-- 
Math problems? Call 1-800-[(10x)(13i)^2]-[sin(xy)/2.362x]

Re: iptables dnat, ebtables, mark

[Moritz Gartenmeister]

hi josh and list

i'm now a little bit confused...

> iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -m physdev --physdev-in $IN_INT -m mac
> --mac-source $MAC -j DNAT --to $WEBSERVER

this was working perfectly, as soon as i added route add -net 172.17.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 dev br0
and also the default gw to br0.

but now i changed a little bit my setup.

LAN --> Firewall --> gateway

the web-server is between the lan and the firewall.

before it was: lan --> firewall --> www --> gw

my rule is:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p -tcp --dport 80 -m physdev --physdev-in eth2 -mac --mac-source $MAC
-j DNAT --to-destination $WEBSERVER:8080

the user cannot access any websites, besides the intranet, but he is not redirected to the web-server.
IMHO it should work: www.google.com -> $WEBSERVER:8080

the web-server is on the same device (eth2).

any ideas?
ok. i also added -p tcp and --dport 80 and 8080, but removing this does not help.

regards
moritz

Josh Nerius wrote:
> I have been experimenting with a very similar setup and have found
> that in order to DNAT traffic transparently coming through the bridge,
> it was necessary to set an ip address on the virtual bridge interface
> and appropriate routes.
> 
> I haven't needed to use ebtables up to this point...Here is a rule
> that I've used that I've had some luck with.
> 
> iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -m physdev --physdev-in $IN_INT -m mac
> --mac-source $MAC -j DNAT --to $WEBSERVER
> 
> Make sure to properly set the physdev interface. Though this isn't
> entirely necessary, I've seen weird things happen without it.
> 
> It is important that the site you're DNATing to doesn't require host
> headers as this has seemingly caused issues.
> 
> Another approach I'm experimenting with is DNATing dns requests
> instead to a server set for the purpose of resolving everything to a
> particular ip and then dropping all other traffic from that customer
> that's not either destined for the dns server or the web server that
> you're directing them to.
> 
> Let me know if this helps.
> 
> Josh Nerius
> 
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:42:46 +0100, Moritz Gartenmeister
> <moritz@uplink-verein.ch> wrote:
> 
>>hi
>>
>>my idea:
>>i know the mac-adress from a compromised computer in my lan. i want to redirect all the traffic from
>>this computer to a webserver (to show up a page with e.g. "bad guy! you got a virus").
>>
>>my system:
>>debian testing 2.6.7
>>iptables
>>ebtables
>>bridge-code
>>
>>my solution so far:
>>ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -s $MAC -j mark --set-mark 8 --mark-target CONTINUE
>>there are no other rules in this chain.
>>some more rules in -A FORWARD all with -s macadress, but not the one above.
>>
>>is the only rule in prerouting nat.
>>iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j DNAT --to-destination $IP-WWW
>>
>>is the first role in the mangle chain.
>>iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 0x8 -j ACCEPT
>>
>>one check rule in mangl POSTROUTING
>>iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m -mark --makr 0x8 -j LOG --log-prefix IPT_MARK
>>
>>my problem:
>>the user can access the webserver and only this server, but the user is not redirected to the
>>web-server, if he tries to access e.g. www.google.com. he only get an error-message.
>>
>>my observation:
>>number of packets differ...
>>ebtables 213 packets
>>prerouting mangle 200 packets
>>prerouting nat 118 packets
>>postrouting mangle 93 packets
>>
>>any explanations? the number should be at least the same. i don't understand this. the filter-rules
>>seem to work properly...
>>
>>cheers
>>moritz
>>
>>--
>>Uplink student association
>>Moritz Gartenmeister
>>Bülachstrasse 1 F
>>8057 Zürich
>>Switzerland
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Uplink student association
Moritz Gartenmeister
Bülachstrasse 1 F
8057 Zürich
Switzerland