From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: debarbos@redhat.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <mricon@kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
sashiko-bot@kernel.org, sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev,
sashiko@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Kernel Workflows <workflows@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kfree@google.com
Subject: Re: Stop false review statements
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 23:33:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f3d7f48-5766-425b-91f6-0acdb5554584@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agjb7-q-p2SemgJa@debarbos-thinkpadt14gen5.rmtusma.csb>
On 16/05/2026 23:29, Derek Barbosa wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 03:28:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>
>> Couldn't this be something like:
>>
>> AI-analysed-by: bot-X
>
> +1
But why? What is the benefit of storing in Git log information that some
tool did work?
We do not store checkpatch result (another pattern matching tool),
Coverity, Smatch, LKP or syzkallers.
Instead just blank +1 please provide arguments why this is useful for us.
I find it opposite: clogging commits with useless information, because
some arbitrary and completely closed-source tool did analysis means
nothing to me one year later when I look at the commit in the Git history.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-16 8:05 Stop false review statements Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-16 12:11 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-16 12:16 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-16 12:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-16 12:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-16 13:24 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-05-16 13:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-16 21:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2026-05-16 15:20 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2026-05-16 15:36 ` Greg KH
2026-05-16 15:41 ` Roman Gushchin
2026-05-16 15:45 ` Greg KH
2026-05-16 15:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2026-05-16 18:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-16 21:29 ` Derek Barbosa
2026-05-16 21:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2026-05-16 21:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2026-05-16 18:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-16 18:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2026-05-16 19:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-16 19:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-16 19:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-16 19:31 ` Roman Gushchin
2026-05-16 19:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2026-05-16 20:41 ` Theodore Tso
2026-05-16 22:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f3d7f48-5766-425b-91f6-0acdb5554584@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=debarbos@redhat.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kfree@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mricon@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.