From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
beanhuo@micron.com, bvanassche@acm.org, tomas.winkler@intel.com,
cang@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between query REQ and query RSP in query trace
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:30:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fd0591ce84684448e3f7720321f0c90eb3dccba.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207102126.66d8e4f7@gandalf.local.home>
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 10:21 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > @@ -321,9 +321,15 @@ static void ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(struct
> > ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
> > static void ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > unsigned int tag,
> > const char *str)
> > {
> > - struct utp_upiu_req *rq = hba->lrb[tag].ucd_req_ptr;
> > + struct utp_upiu_req *rq_rsp;
> > +
>
> I would add:
>
> if (!trace_ufshcd_upiu_enabled())
> return;
>
> Why do the work if the trace point is not enabled?
>
> -- Steve
Steve,
Thanks a lot, I will fix it in the next version.
Thanks,
Bean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-08 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-06 16:42 [PATCH v1 0/3] Three fixes for the UPIU trace Bean Huo
2020-12-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between query REQ and query RSP in query trace Bean Huo
2020-12-06 18:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-07 7:45 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-07 15:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-12-08 21:30 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2020-12-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace Bean Huo
2020-12-06 18:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-07 7:49 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs: Make UPIU trace easier differentiate among CDB, OSF, and TM Bean Huo
2020-12-07 7:57 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-07 11:14 ` Bean Huo
2020-12-08 8:35 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-08 21:42 ` Bean Huo
2020-12-07 15:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-12-07 16:40 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-07 17:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-12-08 8:03 ` Avri Altman
2020-12-07 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-12-08 21:36 ` Bean Huo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4fd0591ce84684448e3f7720321f0c90eb3dccba.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.