From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Rajeev kumar <rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MFD: twl6040: Fix revision information
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:01:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5005623A.10808@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <500508B0.9010009@st.com>
On 07/17/2012 08:39 AM, Rajeev kumar wrote:
>> #define TWL6040_REV_ES1_0 0x00
>> -#define TWL6040_REV_ES1_1 0x01
>> -#define TWL6040_REV_ES1_2 0x02
>> +#define TWL6040_REV_ES1_1 0x01 /* Rev ES1.1 and ES1.2 */
>> +#define TWL6040_REV_ES1_3 0x02
>>
>> #define TWL6040_IRQ_TH 0
>> #define TWL6040_IRQ_PLUG 1
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> index a36e9fc..2786de2 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ int twl6040_get_hs_step_size(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
>> {
>> struct twl6040 *twl6040 = codec->control_data;
>>
>> - if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV_ES1_2)
>> + if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV_ES1_3)
>
>
> Instead of doing this change why not you take a #define for revision and do
> if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV)
ES1.1, ES1.2 of twl6040 have 2mV HS step. Newer revisions (ES1.3 of twl6040
and twl6041) have 1mV HS step.
Here the comment was correct, but the define name was incorrect.
>
> ~Rajeev
>
>> /* For ES under ES_1.3 HS step is 2 mV */
>> return 2;
>> else
>
--
Péter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
To: Rajeev kumar <rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/2] MFD: twl6040: Fix revision information
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:01:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5005623A.10808@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <500508B0.9010009@st.com>
On 07/17/2012 08:39 AM, Rajeev kumar wrote:
>> #define TWL6040_REV_ES1_0 0x00
>> -#define TWL6040_REV_ES1_1 0x01
>> -#define TWL6040_REV_ES1_2 0x02
>> +#define TWL6040_REV_ES1_1 0x01 /* Rev ES1.1 and ES1.2 */
>> +#define TWL6040_REV_ES1_3 0x02
>>
>> #define TWL6040_IRQ_TH 0
>> #define TWL6040_IRQ_PLUG 1
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> index a36e9fc..2786de2 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c
>> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ int twl6040_get_hs_step_size(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
>> {
>> struct twl6040 *twl6040 = codec->control_data;
>>
>> - if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV_ES1_2)
>> + if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV_ES1_3)
>
>
> Instead of doing this change why not you take a #define for revision and do
> if (twl6040_get_revid(twl6040)< TWL6040_REV)
ES1.1, ES1.2 of twl6040 have 2mV HS step. Newer revisions (ES1.3 of twl6040
and twl6041) have 1mV HS step.
Here the comment was correct, but the define name was incorrect.
>
> ~Rajeev
>
>> /* For ES under ES_1.3 HS step is 2 mV */
>> return 2;
>> else
>
--
Péter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-17 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-16 9:49 [PATCH 0/2] MFD: twl6040: Version support fixes, additions Peter Ujfalusi
2012-07-16 9:49 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-07-16 9:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] MFD: twl6040: Fix revision information Peter Ujfalusi
2012-07-17 6:39 ` Rajeev kumar
2012-07-17 6:39 ` [alsa-devel] " Rajeev kumar
2012-07-17 11:55 ` Gabriel M. Beddingfield
2012-07-17 11:55 ` [alsa-devel] " Gabriel M. Beddingfield
2012-07-17 13:01 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2012-07-17 13:01 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-07-16 9:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] MFD: twl6040: Add support for twl6041 Peter Ujfalusi
2012-07-16 9:49 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-07-24 22:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] MFD: twl6040: Version support fixes, additions Samuel Ortiz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5005623A.10808@ti.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=rajeev-dlh.kumar@st.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.