From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@linaro.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:43:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50069361.1080509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120718103311.GG22739@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On 18/07/12 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 18/07/12 10:59, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> It's not the using device tree bit that creates concern for me here,
>>> it's the fact that the board and silicon aren't being separated.
>
>> What's the difference?
>
>>> +- db8500.dtsi // silicon
>>> \
>>> +-- snowball.dts // board
>
> I have glanced at some of this stuff in the past, thanks. Now think how
> that's working for people when they put the configuration for the
> silicon in the same DT node as the configuration for the board...
Granted, ideally the configuration and silicon description should be
separated. I don't know that is the case for us yet however. That is
something I'll enforce when we have a new dts file, which will be coming
very soon.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:43:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50069361.1080509@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120718103311.GG22739@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On 18/07/12 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 18/07/12 10:59, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> It's not the using device tree bit that creates concern for me here,
>>> it's the fact that the board and silicon aren't being separated.
>
>> What's the difference?
>
>>> +- db8500.dtsi // silicon
>>> \
>>> +-- snowball.dts // board
>
> I have glanced at some of this stuff in the past, thanks. Now think how
> that's working for people when they put the configuration for the
> silicon in the same DT node as the configuration for the board...
Granted, ideally the configuration and silicon description should be
separated. I don't know that is the case for us yet however. That is
something I'll enforce when we have a new dts file, which will be coming
very soon.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
M: +44 77 88 633 515
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-18 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-10 6:41 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 6:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 6:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 6:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-10 8:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-10 8:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 13:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-12 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-12 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-13 11:03 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-13 11:03 ` Lee Jones
[not found] ` <20120712131231.GH2194-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-14 21:34 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-14 21:34 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-14 21:34 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 10:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 10:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 11:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 11:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 13:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 13:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 13:55 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 13:55 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:06 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 13:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:02 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 14:02 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 14:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:22 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 14:52 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-17 14:52 ` Lee Jones
[not found] ` <50057C1A.80606-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-17 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 5:33 ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-18 5:33 ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-18 5:33 ` Shawn Guo
2012-07-18 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 10:29 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 10:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 10:43 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-07-18 10:43 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 7:35 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 7:35 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 11:12 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-18 11:24 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-18 11:24 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-16 11:37 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 11:37 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 12:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-07-16 12:35 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120716123550.GE17435-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-16 19:45 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 19:45 ` Linus Walleij
2012-07-16 19:45 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <CACRpkdaMB-n7XYcxE8QtAm-WrGc2DR0krfTjQZCbvOL1HYep1Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-16 20:04 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-16 20:04 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-16 20:04 ` Chris Ball
2012-07-17 13:10 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-17 13:10 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-19 5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-19 5:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-19 5:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 6:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 6:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 6:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-13 7:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-09-13 7:09 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-11-15 5:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-15 5:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-15 5:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50069361.1080509@linaro.org \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=dsaxena@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rubini@gnudd.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.