From: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Michel Dänzer" <michel.daenzer@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Jerome Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] drm/radeon: check for allocation failure in radeon_ring_backup()
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:45:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500960F8.6060906@vodafone.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120720111700.GB22245@elgon.mountain>
On 20.07.2012 13:17, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Static checkers complain if this we don't check for allocation failure.
> Also we can use the new kmalloc_array() function here as a cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
What's the benefit of using kmalloc_array instead of just kmalloc?
Anyway it's:
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
> index 75cbe46..5a0ef24 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
> @@ -402,7 +402,11 @@ unsigned radeon_ring_backup(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_ring *ring
> }
>
> /* and then save the content of the ring */
> - *data = kmalloc(size * 4, GFP_KERNEL);
> + *data = kmalloc_array(size, sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!*data) {
> + mutex_unlock(&rdev->ring_lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> for (i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
> (*data)[i] = ring->ring[ptr++];
> ptr &= ring->ptr_mask;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Christian König" <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"Michel Dänzer" <michel.daenzer@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Jerome Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] drm/radeon: check for allocation failure in radeon_ring_backup()
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:45:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <500960F8.6060906@vodafone.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120720111700.GB22245@elgon.mountain>
On 20.07.2012 13:17, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Static checkers complain if this we don't check for allocation failure.
> Also we can use the new kmalloc_array() function here as a cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
What's the benefit of using kmalloc_array instead of just kmalloc?
Anyway it's:
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
> index 75cbe46..5a0ef24 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c
> @@ -402,7 +402,11 @@ unsigned radeon_ring_backup(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_ring *ring
> }
>
> /* and then save the content of the ring */
> - *data = kmalloc(size * 4, GFP_KERNEL);
> + *data = kmalloc_array(size, sizeof(uint32_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!*data) {
> + mutex_unlock(&rdev->ring_lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> for (i = 0; i < size; ++i) {
> (*data)[i] = ring->ring[ptr++];
> ptr &= ring->ptr_mask;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-20 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-20 11:17 [patch] drm/radeon: check for allocation failure in radeon_ring_backup() Dan Carpenter
2012-07-20 11:17 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-07-20 13:45 ` Christian König [this message]
2012-07-20 13:45 ` Christian König
2012-07-20 14:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-07-20 14:35 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=500960F8.6060906@vodafone.de \
--to=deathsimple@vodafone.de \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michel.daenzer@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.