Re: nothing building under denzil-7.0.1

[Jim Abernathy <jfabernathy@gmail.com>]

On 07/21/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:55 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 15:39 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 16:35 -0400, Jim Abernathy wrote:
>>>> On 07/20/2012 04:29 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
>>>>> On 07/20/2012 01:11 PM, Jim Abernathy wrote:
>>>>>> There must be some basic thing I'm missing.  Nothing that I used to
>>>>>> build under denzil 7.0 will now build under denzil 7.0.1 or tracking the
>>>>>> denzil branch.  Are all the BSPs required to be updated to 7.0.1 before
>>>>>> you can run?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd thought I'd check before I post a bunch of log files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just downloaded the poky 7.0.1 tarball and cd'ed to that untarred
>>>>>> directory and untarred the 7.0 Intel BSPs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There must be a step I'm missing.  otherwise this would not have gotten
>>>>>> thru testing before deployment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim A
>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> We need more specific information about the error(s) you're seeing.
>>>>> We've done extensive QA with 7.0.1 and meta-intel, so I imagine there
>>>>> must be a step you've forgotten.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example, you are using the denzil branch of meta-intel, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>> I think it maybe that old problem with the n450 SRCREC being blank in
>>>> the linux-yocto bbappend file.  Obviously that BSP didn't get fixed
>>>> before 7.0.1 was deployed.  I'll put in the ones I used to patch in and
>>>> see if it works.
>>>>
>>> I updated the n450 in both the denzil and master meta-intel branches,
>>> but the tarball still needs to be updated with that fix.
>>>
>>> Is this the problem you're seeing, or are there other problems you're
>>> seeing with this and/or the other meta-intel BSPs?
>>>
>> As a sanity check, I just now downloaded the denzil-7.0.1 tarball and
>> the denzil sugarbay tarball and built successfully without any problems.
>>
> Also did a fresh clone of meta-intel, checked out meta-intel/denzil and
> successfully built n450 with the denzil-7.0.1 tarball here with no
> problems.
>
> Tom
>
I can confirm I had no issues doing just what you did. tarball for 
denzil-7.0.1 and denzil clone for meta-intel and default core-image-sato 
for n450.

Next, I cloned poky and checked out the tag denzil-7.0.1, which in 
theory should match the tarball I ran with in the above test. I cloned 
meta-intel and checked out the branch denzil, just as above.

So this good news is that worked as expected. The denzil-7.0.1 tag 
equals the tarball.

So the only problem is the denzil branch of poky has some problem that's 
seen in denzil-7.0.1 as it relates to n450.

Jim A


>> Tom
>>
>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>> Jim A
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> yocto mailing list
>>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> yocto mailing list
>>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>