* Merging alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror to one GIT repo @ 2012-07-24 13:17 Jaroslav Kysela 2012-07-24 13:34 ` Takashi Iwai 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jaroslav Kysela @ 2012-07-24 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ALSA development; +Cc: Takashi Iwai Hi all, I believe, it's time to manage only one GIT repository for the alsa-driver package now. The merge has benefits mainly for the end users - bisecting may work, the correlation between kernel sources and our out-of-kernel build framework becomes more strong. I merged the alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror repos with full history. I also added some code changes to enable the "build-in" mirror tree in Makefile and gitcompile from v1.0.18 (but I don't think that it will be used). The structure of new repository is similar, but the kernel mirrored code is located in the mirror/ subdirectory. The paths are exactly same as in the Linux kernel tree, so possible patches can be applied without any path modifications. Of course, we may create a bash script to do proper and full cherry-picks between kernel and mirrored trees (comments, author, dates). New temporary repository has name alsa-driver.new: http://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-driver.new.git;a=summary The another difference is that the releases are now branches not tags. It allows me to do quick fixes out of the standard development or separate the main development in the release time window (to not include some very new code). The previous branches won't contain probably any additional commits, but it's probably better to play with only one reference scheme. I think that the change from alsa-driver.git to alsa-driver.new.git should be quick. Please, report any objections or acks now. Schedule: When accepted, I will rename the original alsa-driver.git repository to alsa-driver.old.git and move alsa-driver.new.git to alsa-driver.git quickly. 1.0.26 release: This was my last big change (with the ALSA server upgrade) which blocked me to do the 1.0.26 release. I'm going to create new release after the repos switch ASAP. Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Merging alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror to one GIT repo 2012-07-24 13:17 Merging alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror to one GIT repo Jaroslav Kysela @ 2012-07-24 13:34 ` Takashi Iwai 2012-07-24 14:29 ` Jaroslav Kysela 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Takashi Iwai @ 2012-07-24 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaroslav Kysela; +Cc: ALSA development At Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:17:57 +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > Hi all, > > I believe, it's time to manage only one GIT repository for the > alsa-driver package now. The merge has benefits mainly for the end users > - bisecting may work, the correlation between kernel sources and our > out-of-kernel build framework becomes more strong. The biggest question from my side is how to handle it in future. IMHO, the current alsa-driver tree structure isn't in the best form. Alternatively, we can change the alsa-driver tree into the standard linux-kernel tree form: i.e. linux-kernel plus the extra alsa-driver build stubs. In that way, you can keep the consistency by pulling the main kernel part easily into alsa-driver tree if the change in the build stub is required. Of course, it means some directory changes would be required. But git pull is much saner than cherry-picking each commit to a different tree (alsa-kmirror) with directory/path conversions. The downside is that creating a traditional alsa-driver release tarball won't be straightforward but need some script. But it shouldn't be too hard. Also, the release management of alsa-driver is another question. It's pretty obvious that 99% of changes nowadays are in the driver. And we are working rather together with the kernel release cycle more than the ALSA release. Thus it's more natural to release the alsa-driver along the kernel release cycle. That is, we may release alsa-driver-3.5 now containing the same stuff for 3.5 kernel but also with the external build stubs. It no longer needs to stick with the old "ALSA version", IMO. The ALSA version is rather confusing for both users and developers since the same version appears in the different kernels with pretty different ALSA driver codes actually. Thoughts? thanks, Takashi > I merged the alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror repos with full history. I > also added some code changes to enable the "build-in" mirror tree in > Makefile and gitcompile from v1.0.18 (but I don't think that it will be > used). > > The structure of new repository is similar, but the kernel mirrored > code is located in the mirror/ subdirectory. The paths are exactly same > as in the Linux kernel tree, so possible patches can be applied without > any path modifications. Of course, we may create a bash script to do > proper and full cherry-picks between kernel and mirrored trees > (comments, author, dates). > > New temporary repository has name alsa-driver.new: > > http://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-driver.new.git;a=summary > > The another difference is that the releases are now branches not tags. > It allows me to do quick fixes out of the standard development or > separate the main development in the release time window (to not include > some very new code). The previous branches won't contain probably any > additional commits, but it's probably better to play with only one > reference scheme. > > I think that the change from alsa-driver.git to alsa-driver.new.git > should be quick. Please, report any objections or acks now. > > Schedule: When accepted, I will rename the original alsa-driver.git > repository to alsa-driver.old.git and move alsa-driver.new.git to > alsa-driver.git quickly. > > 1.0.26 release: This was my last big change (with the ALSA server > upgrade) which blocked me to do the 1.0.26 release. I'm going to create > new release after the repos switch ASAP. > > Jaroslav > > -- > Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> > Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer > ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Merging alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror to one GIT repo 2012-07-24 13:34 ` Takashi Iwai @ 2012-07-24 14:29 ` Jaroslav Kysela 2012-09-26 2:23 ` Grant Diffey 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jaroslav Kysela @ 2012-07-24 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Takashi Iwai; +Cc: ALSA development Date 24.7.2012 15:34, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:17:57 +0200, > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I believe, it's time to manage only one GIT repository for the >> alsa-driver package now. The merge has benefits mainly for the end users >> - bisecting may work, the correlation between kernel sources and our >> out-of-kernel build framework becomes more strong. > > The biggest question from my side is how to handle it in future. > > IMHO, the current alsa-driver tree structure isn't in the best form. > Alternatively, we can change the alsa-driver tree into the standard > linux-kernel tree form: i.e. linux-kernel plus the extra alsa-driver > build stubs. In that way, you can keep the consistency by pulling the > main kernel part easily into alsa-driver tree if the change in the > build stub is required. > > Of course, it means some directory changes would be required. But > git pull is much saner than cherry-picking each commit to a different > tree (alsa-kmirror) with directory/path conversions. Although the git merging features are very good, I do not prefer to build something on top of this development type. The cross patch management may reveal also some auto-merge mistakes (I hit few). Also, working with the whole Linux tree is not necessary for the developement. I mostly debug things on top of the distro specific kernel. I don't understand the requirement to fetch 99% of unused code to build the sound driver for another kernel. > The downside is that creating a traditional alsa-driver release > tarball won't be straightforward but need some script. But it > shouldn't be too hard. > > > Also, the release management of alsa-driver is another question. > It's pretty obvious that 99% of changes nowadays are in the driver. > And we are working rather together with the kernel release cycle more > than the ALSA release. Thus it's more natural to release the > alsa-driver along the kernel release cycle. > > That is, we may release alsa-driver-3.5 now containing the same stuff > for 3.5 kernel but also with the external build stubs. It no longer > needs to stick with the old "ALSA version", IMO. The ALSA version > is rather confusing for both users and developers since the same > version appears in the different kernels with pretty different ALSA > driver codes actually. Yes, the kernel build-in ALSA version should be changed (to something like 'k3.5' or removed). I am not sure, if it's necessary to relate the alsa-driver releases to the kernel releases. From my perspective, it's just a snapshot, which may be more tested for the compilation on more different kernels. The standard ALSA versioning make sense for this, too. Timestamps show the relationship nicely. Jaroslav >> I merged the alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror repos with full history. I >> also added some code changes to enable the "build-in" mirror tree in >> Makefile and gitcompile from v1.0.18 (but I don't think that it will be >> used). >> >> The structure of new repository is similar, but the kernel mirrored >> code is located in the mirror/ subdirectory. The paths are exactly same >> as in the Linux kernel tree, so possible patches can be applied without >> any path modifications. Of course, we may create a bash script to do >> proper and full cherry-picks between kernel and mirrored trees >> (comments, author, dates). >> >> New temporary repository has name alsa-driver.new: >> >> http://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-driver.new.git;a=summary >> >> The another difference is that the releases are now branches not tags. >> It allows me to do quick fixes out of the standard development or >> separate the main development in the release time window (to not include >> some very new code). The previous branches won't contain probably any >> additional commits, but it's probably better to play with only one >> reference scheme. >> >> I think that the change from alsa-driver.git to alsa-driver.new.git >> should be quick. Please, report any objections or acks now. >> >> Schedule: When accepted, I will rename the original alsa-driver.git >> repository to alsa-driver.old.git and move alsa-driver.new.git to >> alsa-driver.git quickly. >> >> 1.0.26 release: This was my last big change (with the ALSA server >> upgrade) which blocked me to do the 1.0.26 release. I'm going to create >> new release after the repos switch ASAP. >> >> Jaroslav >> >> -- >> Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> >> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer >> ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc. >> -- Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Merging alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror to one GIT repo 2012-07-24 14:29 ` Jaroslav Kysela @ 2012-09-26 2:23 ` Grant Diffey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Grant Diffey @ 2012-09-26 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaroslav Kysela; +Cc: Takashi Iwai, ALSA development Jaroslav, This re-organise of git repos has currently broken the link from the project website to alsa-info.sh: http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-info.sh this looks like a 302 redirect to http://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-driver.git;a=blob_plain;f=utils/alsa-info.shwhich currently giving a 404 it should point to: http://git.alsa-project.org/?p=alsa-driver.git;a=blob_plain;f=alsa/utils/alsa-info.sh;hb=refs/heads/buildI think ? who has the access required to fix this? Grant ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-26 2:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-07-24 13:17 Merging alsa-driver and alsa-kmirror to one GIT repo Jaroslav Kysela 2012-07-24 13:34 ` Takashi Iwai 2012-07-24 14:29 ` Jaroslav Kysela 2012-09-26 2:23 ` Grant Diffey
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.