* what's the state of building for a (OMAP4460) pandaboard ES?
@ 2012-07-31 11:43 Robert P. J. Day
2012-07-31 15:06 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-07-31 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yocto discussion list
i notice that the current meta-ti layer has a pandaboard.conf file
that refers specifically to the OMAP 4430 -- the original panda.
this weekend, i'd like to build, say, a core-image-minimal for my ES.
is there a writeup anywhere that documents what issues i might run
into regarding the panda versus the panda ES? thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: what's the state of building for a (OMAP4460) pandaboard ES?
2012-07-31 11:43 what's the state of building for a (OMAP4460) pandaboard ES? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2012-07-31 15:06 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-07-31 17:04 ` William Mills
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-07-31 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: yocto
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 06:43:17 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i notice that the current meta-ti layer has a pandaboard.conf file
> that refers specifically to the OMAP 4430 -- the original panda.
> this weekend, i'd like to build, say, a core-image-minimal for my ES.
> is there a writeup anywhere that documents what issues i might run
> into regarding the panda versus the panda ES? thanks.
I'm not sure but I think you probably need to direct this question to the
meta-ti mailing list.
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: what's the state of building for a (OMAP4460) pandaboard ES?
2012-07-31 15:06 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2012-07-31 17:04 ` William Mills
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Mills @ 2012-07-31 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Eggleton; +Cc: yocto
On 07/31/2012 11:06 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 July 2012 06:43:17 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> i notice that the current meta-ti layer has a pandaboard.conf file
>> that refers specifically to the OMAP 4430 -- the original panda.
>> this weekend, i'd like to build, say, a core-image-minimal for my ES.
>> is there a writeup anywhere that documents what issues i might run
>> into regarding the panda versus the panda ES? thanks.
>
> I'm not sure but I think you probably need to direct this question to the
> meta-ti mailing list.
>
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
>
I did see this question, I just don't have an answer. We are seeing if
we can get a part time maintainer for panda lined up. Right now it is
just something a few volunteers did a few months ago. There are no
product level plans for panda and Yocto.
I hope to get panda on the list of platforms for nightly (or at least
weekly) builds. That way the status will be visible.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-31 17:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-31 11:43 what's the state of building for a (OMAP4460) pandaboard ES? Robert P. J. Day
2012-07-31 15:06 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-07-31 17:04 ` William Mills
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.