All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3xxx: clockdomain: fix software supervised wakeup/sleep
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:12:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5018201F.7020206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50176FEF.6060600@ti.com>

Hi Rajendra,

On 07/31/2012 12:41 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> On Tuesday 31 July 2012 10:11 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Paul, Rajendra,
>>
>> On 07/27/2012 12:43 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> On Friday 27 July 2012 02:34 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Commit 4da71ae6 ("OMAP: clockdomain: Arch specific funcs for
>>>> clkdm_clk_enable/disable") called the OMAP2xxx-specific functions for
>>>> clockdomain wakeup and sleep.  This would probably have broken
>>>> software-supervised clockdomain wakeup and sleep on OMAP3.
>>>
>>> Its strange this went unnoticed for so long. Thanks for this fix and
>>> sorry about introducing the bug in the first place.
>>
>> Any chance that's because of the following code? I needed to
>> remove this to get the EMU clock domain to turn off on OMAP3
>> whilst testing PMU.
> 
> No, this doesn't seem right. We still have clockdomains for omap2/3
> controlled using clkdm_clk_enable/disable functions called from
> within clk framework, and not clkdm_hwmod_enable/disable from
> within hwmod framework.
> Besides you removing these checks only in clkdm_hwmod_disable (and
> keeping them in clkdm_hwmod_enable) tells me its just hiding some
> usecounting issues you were having with clkdm_clk_enable/disable.

Yes you are right. I was focused in the disable side because the EMU CD
is staying on.

> Btw, on OMAP2/3 as long as a domain has interface clocks which are
> explicitly enabled and autoidled, the clkdm usecount never ends up
> going to 0, which is probably what you are hit with too.

Yes so after further debugging, this is not a problem and not the cause
of my problem either.

Sorry for the noise.

Cheers
Jon

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3xxx: clockdomain: fix software supervised wakeup/sleep
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:12:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5018201F.7020206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50176FEF.6060600@ti.com>

Hi Rajendra,

On 07/31/2012 12:41 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> On Tuesday 31 July 2012 10:11 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Paul, Rajendra,
>>
>> On 07/27/2012 12:43 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> On Friday 27 July 2012 02:34 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Commit 4da71ae6 ("OMAP: clockdomain: Arch specific funcs for
>>>> clkdm_clk_enable/disable") called the OMAP2xxx-specific functions for
>>>> clockdomain wakeup and sleep.  This would probably have broken
>>>> software-supervised clockdomain wakeup and sleep on OMAP3.
>>>
>>> Its strange this went unnoticed for so long. Thanks for this fix and
>>> sorry about introducing the bug in the first place.
>>
>> Any chance that's because of the following code? I needed to
>> remove this to get the EMU clock domain to turn off on OMAP3
>> whilst testing PMU.
> 
> No, this doesn't seem right. We still have clockdomains for omap2/3
> controlled using clkdm_clk_enable/disable functions called from
> within clk framework, and not clkdm_hwmod_enable/disable from
> within hwmod framework.
> Besides you removing these checks only in clkdm_hwmod_disable (and
> keeping them in clkdm_hwmod_enable) tells me its just hiding some
> usecounting issues you were having with clkdm_clk_enable/disable.

Yes you are right. I was focused in the disable side because the EMU CD
is staying on.

> Btw, on OMAP2/3 as long as a domain has interface clocks which are
> explicitly enabled and autoidled, the clkdm usecount never ends up
> going to 0, which is probably what you are hit with too.

Yes so after further debugging, this is not a problem and not the cause
of my problem either.

Sorry for the noise.

Cheers
Jon

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-31 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26 21:04 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3xxx: clockdomain: fix software supervised wakeup/sleep Paul Walmsley
2012-07-26 21:04 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-07-27  5:43 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-27  5:43   ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-31  4:41   ` Jon Hunter
2012-07-31  4:41     ` Jon Hunter
2012-07-31  5:41     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-31  5:41       ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-07-31 18:12       ` Jon Hunter [this message]
2012-07-31 18:12         ` Jon Hunter
2012-07-27  7:58 ` Nayak, Rajendra
2012-07-27  7:58   ` Nayak, Rajendra
2012-07-27 13:38   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-07-27 13:38     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-07-30 16:29   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-07-30 16:29     ` Paul Walmsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5018201F.7020206@ti.com \
    --to=jon-hunter@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.