From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, olalilja@yahoo.se,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, lrg@ti.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:55:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5019356E.6020407@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208011332.02500.arnd@arndb.de>
On 01/08/12 14:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> Looks like you're adding the same call to each of the three cases:
>>> mop500, snowball and hrefv60+. How about moving it before or after
>>> the if/elseif block?
>>
>> The Snowball one is different 'mop500_msp_init' -> 'mop500_of_msp_init'.
>
> Ah, I see. Is there a problem in always using mop500_of_msp_init then?
> I would guess that this just means you'd have to put the msp into the
> device tree files, which don't yet exist for mop500 and hrefv60.
Although that is true, it's only part of the issue.
mop500_of_msp_init is only a temporary solution to aid in step-by-step
enablement of DT for audio. By the end of the patch-set it has been
removed (along with the call to it if 'of_machine_is_compatible
("calaosystems,snowball-a9500")'. What I can do it write a patch to
consolidate the calls _after_ "ARM: ux500: Remove platform registration
of MSP devices", as a bolt-on.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:55:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5019356E.6020407@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208011332.02500.arnd@arndb.de>
On 01/08/12 14:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> Looks like you're adding the same call to each of the three cases:
>>> mop500, snowball and hrefv60+. How about moving it before or after
>>> the if/elseif block?
>>
>> The Snowball one is different 'mop500_msp_init' -> 'mop500_of_msp_init'.
>
> Ah, I see. Is there a problem in always using mop500_of_msp_init then?
> I would guess that this just means you'd have to put the msp into the
> device tree files, which don't yet exist for mop500 and hrefv60.
Although that is true, it's only part of the issue.
mop500_of_msp_init is only a temporary solution to aid in step-by-step
enablement of DT for audio. By the end of the patch-set it has been
removed (along with the call to it if 'of_machine_is_compatible
("calaosystems,snowball-a9500")'. What I can do it write a patch to
consolidate the calls _after_ "ARM: ux500: Remove platform registration
of MSP devices", as a bolt-on.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com,
linus.walleij@stericsson.com, olalilja@yahoo.se,
ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, lrg@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:55:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5019356E.6020407@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201208011332.02500.arnd@arndb.de>
On 01/08/12 14:32, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 August 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> Looks like you're adding the same call to each of the three cases:
>>> mop500, snowball and hrefv60+. How about moving it before or after
>>> the if/elseif block?
>>
>> The Snowball one is different 'mop500_msp_init' -> 'mop500_of_msp_init'.
>
> Ah, I see. Is there a problem in always using mop500_of_msp_init then?
> I would guess that this just means you'd have to put the msp into the
> device tree files, which don't yet exist for mop500 and hrefv60.
Although that is true, it's only part of the issue.
mop500_of_msp_init is only a temporary solution to aid in step-by-step
enablement of DT for audio. By the end of the patch-set it has been
removed (along with the call to it if 'of_machine_is_compatible
("calaosystems,snowball-a9500")'. What I can do it write a patch to
consolidate the calls _after_ "ARM: ux500: Remove platform registration
of MSP devices", as a bolt-on.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 145+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-31 13:31 [PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 13:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:25 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:25 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:25 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 15:15 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 15:15 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 15:15 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 15:18 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 15:18 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 15:18 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-01 7:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 7:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 7:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-01 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-01 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-01 13:50 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 13:50 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 16:08 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-01 16:08 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-01 16:08 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-01 19:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-01 19:41 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2012-08-01 19:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-02 7:45 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-02 7:45 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-02 17:56 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-02 17:56 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2012-08-02 17:56 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-03 8:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-03 8:30 ` [alsa-devel] " Lee Jones
2012-08-03 8:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-04 0:48 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-04 0:48 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2012-08-04 0:48 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-02 5:58 ` Ola Lilja
2012-08-02 5:58 ` Ola Lilja
2012-08-02 5:58 ` Ola Lilja
2012-08-02 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-02 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-02 9:59 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-10 11:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-10 11:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-10 11:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-08-02 12:21 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-02 12:21 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-02 12:21 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 16:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-07-31 16:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-08-01 7:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 7:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 7:37 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 8:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 8:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 8:19 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 8:46 ` [PATCH 3/6 v2] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, no matching driver name for, 'snd_soc_u8500' Lee Jones
2012-08-01 8:46 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 8:46 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-31 13:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-31 13:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-31 14:29 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:29 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:29 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-31 14:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-31 14:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-31 20:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 20:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 20:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 22:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-31 22:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-01 7:56 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 7:56 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 7:56 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 8:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-01 8:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-01 8:48 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 8:48 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 20:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 20:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-01 7:34 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 7:34 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 7:34 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-01 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-01 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-01 13:55 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2012-08-01 13:55 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 13:55 ` Lee Jones
2012-08-01 14:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-08-01 14:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] ASoC: Ux500: Move MSP pinctrl setup into the MSP driver Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:31 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs Mark Brown
2012-07-31 13:40 ` Mark Brown
2012-07-31 14:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-07-31 14:30 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5019356E.6020407@linaro.org \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
--cc=ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com \
--cc=olalilja@yahoo.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.