All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:24:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50220616.6060508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5021D87C.4050400@redhat.com>

On 08/08/2012 11:09 AM, Asias He wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 05:16 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:47:13PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>>> 1) Ramdisk device
>>>       With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
>>>       IOPS boost         : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
>>>       Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
>>> 2) Fusion IO device
>>>       With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
>>>       IOPS boost         : 11%, 11%, 13%, 10%
>>>       Latency improvement: 10%, 10%, 12%, 10%
>>
>> Do you also have numbers for normal SAS/SATA disks?  The changelog should
>> have a reall good explanation of why this is optional, and numbers are a
>> very important part of that.

Yes. I posted the numbers on normal SATA disks a few days ago in the 
thread with Sasha. Will add that data and explanation of why optional to 
the changelog

-- 
Asias

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:24:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50220616.6060508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5021D87C.4050400@redhat.com>

On 08/08/2012 11:09 AM, Asias He wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 05:16 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:47:13PM +0800, Asias He wrote:
>>> 1) Ramdisk device
>>>       With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
>>>       IOPS boost         : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
>>>       Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
>>> 2) Fusion IO device
>>>       With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
>>>       IOPS boost         : 11%, 11%, 13%, 10%
>>>       Latency improvement: 10%, 10%, 12%, 10%
>>
>> Do you also have numbers for normal SAS/SATA disks?  The changelog should
>> have a reall good explanation of why this is optional, and numbers are a
>> very important part of that.

Yes. I posted the numbers on normal SATA disks a few days ago in the 
thread with Sasha. Will add that data and explanation of why optional to 
the changelog

-- 
Asias

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07  8:47 [PATCH V6 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance Asias He
2012-08-07  8:47 ` Asias He
2012-08-07  8:47 ` [PATCH V6 1/2] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk Asias He
2012-08-07  8:47   ` Asias He
2012-08-07  8:47 ` [PATCH V6 2/2] virtio-blk: Add REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support to bio path Asias He
2012-08-07  8:47   ` Asias He
2012-08-07  9:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-07  9:15     ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-08  6:20     ` Asias He
2012-08-08  6:20       ` Asias He
2012-08-07  9:16 ` [PATCH V6 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-07  9:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]   ` <5021D87C.4050400@redhat.com>
2012-08-08  6:24     ` Asias He [this message]
2012-08-08  6:24       ` Asias He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50220616.6060508@redhat.com \
    --to=asias@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.