plughw vs default / per-application volume changer

plughw vs default / per-application volume changer

[antony k]

Hello,
I am new to ALSA and I cant figure out 2 things.

a) if and why should I prefer the "plughw:0,0" over the "default" device
name.
I am developing a simple audio player which is based on the latter.
I made this choice because when I was using plughw:0,0 with other audio
programs(flash player,vlc) open in the background I would get the "Device
is busy" error code.
With default, it's fine.

b) can I have an application specific volume changer? So far I have managed
to tweak the master volume of the "default" device which has a global
effect. Im guessing a) and b) are connected.

Thanks for your time

Re: plughw vs default / per-application volume changer

[Clemens Ladisch]

antony k wrote:
> a) if and why should I prefer the "plughw:0,0" over the "default" device
> name.
> I am developing a simple audio player which is based on the latter.
> I made this choice because when I was using plughw:0,0 with other audio
> programs(flash player,vlc) open in the background I would get the "Device
> is busy" error code.
> With default, it's fine.

You have answered your question.

The default device name should be "default".

> b) can I have an application specific volume changer?

Very few sound devices support this in hardware.
Adjust the sound data in your program, or better use PulseAudio.


Regards,
Clemens