From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: hrdl <git@hrdl.eu>, phantomas <phantomas@phantomas.xyz>,
Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify usb-c-connector port on rk3566-pinenote
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:16:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5024969.GXAFRqVoOG@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a726fac9-afe5-4639-b06a-4bccc256d98f@kernel.org>
Am Sonntag, 9. November 2025, 18:37:26 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 09/11/2025 18:05, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > The USB-C connector on the PineNote has only 1 port, so there's no need
> > for a 'ports' node with address-/size-cells properties as a single
> > 'port' node suffices.
> >
> > This fixes the following DT validation issue:
> >
> > Warning (graph_child_address): /i2c@fe5c0000/tcpc@60/connector/ports:
> > graph node has single child node 'port@0',
> > #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
>
> This is not a DT validation, but DTC warning which we do not really fix.
That is good to know. Is the same true for other dtc warnings?
Thanks
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: hrdl <git@hrdl.eu>, phantomas <phantomas@phantomas.xyz>,
Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify usb-c-connector port on rk3566-pinenote
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:16:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5024969.GXAFRqVoOG@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a726fac9-afe5-4639-b06a-4bccc256d98f@kernel.org>
Am Sonntag, 9. November 2025, 18:37:26 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 09/11/2025 18:05, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > The USB-C connector on the PineNote has only 1 port, so there's no need
> > for a 'ports' node with address-/size-cells properties as a single
> > 'port' node suffices.
> >
> > This fixes the following DT validation issue:
> >
> > Warning (graph_child_address): /i2c@fe5c0000/tcpc@60/connector/ports:
> > graph node has single child node 'port@0',
> > #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
>
> This is not a DT validation, but DTC warning which we do not really fix.
That is good to know. Is the same true for other dtc warnings?
Thanks
Heiko
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-09 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-09 17:05 [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for PineNote DT validation issues Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 17:05 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify usb-c-connector port on rk3566-pinenote Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 17:05 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 17:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-09 17:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-09 22:16 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2025-11-09 22:16 ` Heiko Stübner
2025-11-10 7:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-10 7:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-09 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move otg-port to controller " Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 17:05 ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 21:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for PineNote DT validation issues Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 21:52 ` Diederik de Haas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5024969.GXAFRqVoOG@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=git@hrdl.eu \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=phantomas@phantomas.xyz \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.