From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] NULL dereference BUG in sch56xx_init()
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:35:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5024C7EF.7090408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120809144239.GA6604@roeck-us.net>
Hi,
On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Guenter,
>>
>> This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff.
>> Should it be folded into the original one (preferable for me), or be
>> resent as a standalone patch?
>>
> I folded it into the original commit.
>
> Thanks a lot for the test and feedback!
Fengguang, good catch, thanks!
Guenter, 2 remarks:
1) The changing of the type of the address parameter of sch56xx_device_add is
not necessary
2) A similar change is needed for the f71882fg, there the type of the address
variable in f71882fg_init() needs to be changed to int too.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] NULL dereference BUG in sch56xx_init()
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:35:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5024C7EF.7090408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120809144239.GA6604@roeck-us.net>
Hi,
On 08/09/2012 04:42 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:55:26PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Guenter,
>>
>> This commit triggered an oops which can be fixed by the attached diff.
>> Should it be folded into the original one (preferable for me), or be
>> resent as a standalone patch?
>>
> I folded it into the original commit.
>
> Thanks a lot for the test and feedback!
Fengguang, good catch, thanks!
Guenter, 2 remarks:
1) The changing of the type of the address parameter of sch56xx_device_add is
not necessary
2) A similar change is needed for the f71882fg, there the type of the address
variable in f71882fg_init() needs to be changed to int too.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-10 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-09 12:55 NULL dereference BUG in sch56xx_init() Fengguang Wu
2012-08-09 14:42 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2012-08-09 14:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-08-10 8:35 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2012-08-10 8:35 ` [lm-sensors] " Hans de Goede
2012-08-10 15:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-08-10 15:48 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5024C7EF.7090408@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.