All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	amwang@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, rjw@sisk.pl, yinghai.lu@oracle.com,
	tiwai@suse.de, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:39:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5026A6D1.8070403@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5026A5AE.6050608@zytor.com>

On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might
>>> be a better solution.
>>>
>>> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that
>>> are being mapped
>>>
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540
>>>
>> Actually, apply that series of 5 patches.
>>
>
> I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip.
>
> However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying
> the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that.  On the other
> hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway.
>

Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's 
legitimate request for minor code restructuring.  Other than that, the 
patchset is really The Right Thing.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	amwang@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, rjw@sisk.pl, yinghai.lu@oracle.com,
	tiwai@suse.de, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:39:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5026A6D1.8070403@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5026A5AE.6050608@zytor.com>

On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might
>>> be a better solution.
>>>
>>> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that
>>> are being mapped
>>>
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540
>>>
>> Actually, apply that series of 5 patches.
>>
>
> I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip.
>
> However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying
> the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that.  On the other
> hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway.
>

Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's 
legitimate request for minor code restructuring.  Other than that, the 
patchset is really The Right Thing.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-11 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-12  5:21 [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression" Cong Wang
2012-06-15 11:11 ` Cong Wang
2012-06-15 12:15   ` Takashi Iwai
2012-06-15 19:09     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-18  3:10     ` Cong Wang
2012-07-17  3:15 ` Takao Indoh
2012-07-23 10:00   ` Dave Young
2012-07-23 11:22     ` Takao Indoh
2012-07-23 11:22       ` Takao Indoh
2012-07-23 12:51       ` Dave Young
2012-07-23 12:51         ` Dave Young
2012-07-24 15:55       ` Cong Wang
2012-07-24 15:55         ` Cong Wang
2012-07-25  0:19         ` Takao Indoh
2012-07-25  0:19           ` Takao Indoh
2012-08-06 20:42           ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-06 20:42             ` Vivek Goyal
2012-08-06 21:55             ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-06 21:55               ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-11 17:57           ` Jerry Snitselaar
2012-08-11 17:57             ` Jerry Snitselaar
2012-08-11 18:26             ` Jerry Snitselaar
2012-08-11 18:26               ` Jerry Snitselaar
2012-08-11 18:34               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-11 18:34                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-11 18:39                 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-08-11 18:39                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-11 19:33                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-11 19:33                   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5026A6D1.8070403@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yinghai.lu@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.