Re: xl segfault when starting a guest

[Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>]

On 08/06/12 16:27, Ian Jackson wrote:

> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xl segfault when starting a guest"):
>> It looks like 25727:a8d708fcb347 is missing some bits of my original
>> patch got missed during application, specifically the changes to the
>> iscsi/nbd/enbd prefix handling rule.
> 
> This was because:
>  - I mistakenly used the copy of the patch that Ian C had CC'd to me,
>    rather than the copy I got via the mailing list.  The former went
>    via the Citrix corporate email system which mangles things, which
>    is why this is a bad idea.  The latter does not.
>  - When I tried to apply it, it produced a bunch of rejects in the
>    autogenerated files.  However buried in those messages was a reject
>    in the .l source file, which I didn't spot.
>  - I therefore tried to regenerate the flex source (perhaps not with
>    complete success) and committed the result. 
> Sorry for messing this up.
> 
> I have backed out 25727:a8d708fcb347 and reapplied what I think is a
> non-mangled version as 25733:353bc0801b11.


Works for me. Thanks.

Christoph

-- 
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85689 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alberto Bozzo
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632