From: Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Murali Nalajala <mnalajal@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
nico@linaro.org
Subject: Re: ioremap() fail on physical address 0x0 in 3.4 kernel
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:16:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50348030.9080200@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5033C428.2050607@codeaurora.org>
Hi Laura,
On 8/21/2012 10:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> Looks like you are hitting the empty section gap:
>
> 0xfa200000-0xfa300000 1048576 pmd_empty_section_gap+0x0/0x3c ioremap
>
> pmd_empty_section_gap ends up with vm->phys_addr = 0x0 because it was
> never set. This section isn't actually mapped so when searching for the
> range in the static io map it finds this address and returns it but it
> isn't actually a valid address to return. Perhaps ioremap should not
> bother trying to re-use the static iomap if the address is zero and let
> pmd_empty_section_gap use 0x0 as a dummy value?
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ void __iomem * __arm_ioremap_pfn_caller(unsigned
> long pfn,
> */
> read_lock(&vmlist_lock);
> for (area = vmlist; area; area = area->next) {
> - if (!size || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 && pfn >= 0x100000))
> + if (!size || !pfn || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 &&
> + pfn >= 0x100000))
Thanks for the patch, but how about just checking pmd_none on such
addresses and since there won't be any mapping created for such gaps? We
need to check if this is fine for all, since I remember that Nico
added these functions for the OMAP boot issue I guess.
---Trilok Soni
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tsoni@codeaurora.org (Trilok Soni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ioremap() fail on physical address 0x0 in 3.4 kernel
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:16:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50348030.9080200@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5033C428.2050607@codeaurora.org>
Hi Laura,
On 8/21/2012 10:53 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>
> Looks like you are hitting the empty section gap:
>
> 0xfa200000-0xfa300000 1048576 pmd_empty_section_gap+0x0/0x3c ioremap
>
> pmd_empty_section_gap ends up with vm->phys_addr = 0x0 because it was
> never set. This section isn't actually mapped so when searching for the
> range in the static io map it finds this address and returns it but it
> isn't actually a valid address to return. Perhaps ioremap should not
> bother trying to re-use the static iomap if the address is zero and let
> pmd_empty_section_gap use 0x0 as a dummy value?
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ void __iomem * __arm_ioremap_pfn_caller(unsigned
> long pfn,
> */
> read_lock(&vmlist_lock);
> for (area = vmlist; area; area = area->next) {
> - if (!size || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 && pfn >= 0x100000))
> + if (!size || !pfn || (sizeof(phys_addr_t) == 4 &&
> + pfn >= 0x100000))
Thanks for the patch, but how about just checking pmd_none on such
addresses and since there won't be any mapping created for such gaps? We
need to check if this is fine for all, since I remember that Nico
added these functions for the OMAP boot issue I guess.
---Trilok Soni
--
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-21 14:28 ioremap() fail on physical address 0x0 in 3.4 kernel Murali Nalajala
2012-08-21 14:28 ` Murali Nalajala
2012-08-21 17:23 ` Laura Abbott
2012-08-21 17:23 ` Laura Abbott
2012-08-22 6:41 ` Murali Nalajala
2012-08-22 6:41 ` Murali Nalajala
2012-08-22 6:46 ` Trilok Soni [this message]
2012-08-22 6:46 ` Trilok Soni
2012-08-22 9:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-22 9:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-22 11:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-22 11:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-22 13:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-08-22 13:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-08-22 12:03 ` Murali Nalajala
2012-08-22 12:03 ` Murali Nalajala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50348030.9080200@codeaurora.org \
--to=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mnalajal@codeaurora.org \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.