From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, alternative: fix p6 nops on non-modular kernels
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:03:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5034AE84.90708@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5034AC61.9030704@redhat.com>
On 08/22/2012 12:54 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 12:28 PM, Tomas Racek wrote:
>>
>> http://fi.muni.cz/~xracek/debian2.img.bz2
>>
>> Other things are the same.
>>
>> The runtest.sh sets environment for xfstests and runs test 285 which I wrote and and which should test if FS sends discard requests only on free sectors:
>> 285:
>> 1. Create loop device and FS on it.
>> 2. Populate it with some garbage.
>> 3. Get free sectors from FS.
>> 4. Run fstrim and look for discard requests via blk tracer.
>> 5. Compare free sectors to discard requests.
>>
>> The test itself can have some issues but I'm pretty sure it shouldn't crash the system. ;-)
>
> Does the following patch help?
>
It's obvious that it should. You're running a non-modular kernel, and those nops are discarded (probably a leftover from the days patching was a boot-only activity), so the kernel patched garbage over its own code.
-------8<----cut-here-----8<-----------------------------------
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:58:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] x86, alternative: fix p6 nops on non-modular kernels
Probably a leftover from the early days of self-patching, p6nops are
marked __initconst_or_module, which causes them to be discarded in a
non-modular kernel. If something later triggers patching, it will
overwrite kernel code with garbage.
Reported-by: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index afb7ff7..ced4534 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int __init setup_noreplace_paravirt(char *str)
#endif
#ifdef P6_NOP1
-static const unsigned char __initconst_or_module p6nops[] =
+static const unsigned char p6nops[] =
{
P6_NOP1,
P6_NOP2,
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] x86, alternative: fix p6 nops on non-modular kernels
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:03:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5034AE84.90708@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5034AC61.9030704@redhat.com>
On 08/22/2012 12:54 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 12:28 PM, Tomas Racek wrote:
>>
>> http://fi.muni.cz/~xracek/debian2.img.bz2
>>
>> Other things are the same.
>>
>> The runtest.sh sets environment for xfstests and runs test 285 which I wrote and and which should test if FS sends discard requests only on free sectors:
>> 285:
>> 1. Create loop device and FS on it.
>> 2. Populate it with some garbage.
>> 3. Get free sectors from FS.
>> 4. Run fstrim and look for discard requests via blk tracer.
>> 5. Compare free sectors to discard requests.
>>
>> The test itself can have some issues but I'm pretty sure it shouldn't crash the system. ;-)
>
> Does the following patch help?
>
It's obvious that it should. You're running a non-modular kernel, and those nops are discarded (probably a leftover from the days patching was a boot-only activity), so the kernel patched garbage over its own code.
-------8<----cut-here-----8<-----------------------------------
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:58:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] x86, alternative: fix p6 nops on non-modular kernels
Probably a leftover from the early days of self-patching, p6nops are
marked __initconst_or_module, which causes them to be discarded in a
non-modular kernel. If something later triggers patching, it will
overwrite kernel code with garbage.
Reported-by: Tomas Racek <tracek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index afb7ff7..ced4534 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int __init setup_noreplace_paravirt(char *str)
#endif
#ifdef P6_NOP1
-static const unsigned char __initconst_or_module p6nops[] =
+static const unsigned char p6nops[] =
{
P6_NOP1,
P6_NOP2,
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1104118228.1760802.1345121009530.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2012-08-16 13:35 ` x86, nops settings result in kernel crash Tomas Racek
2012-08-16 13:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tomas Racek
2012-08-16 13:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-16 13:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Borislav Petkov
2012-08-16 18:45 ` Tomas Racek
2012-08-16 18:45 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tomas Racek
2012-08-16 18:53 ` Alan Cox
2012-08-16 18:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alan Cox
2012-08-16 21:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-16 21:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-17 7:42 ` Tomas Racek
2012-08-17 7:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tomas Racek
2012-08-16 21:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-08-16 21:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2012-08-16 21:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-08-17 7:43 ` Tomas Racek
2012-08-17 7:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tomas Racek
2012-08-17 7:43 ` Tomas Racek
2012-08-17 8:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-17 8:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Borislav Petkov
2012-08-17 8:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-08-20 17:13 ` Tomas Racek
2012-08-20 17:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tomas Racek
2012-08-20 17:13 ` Tomas Racek
2012-08-21 7:22 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-08-21 7:22 ` Michael Tokarev
2012-08-21 9:28 ` Tomas Racek
2012-08-21 9:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tomas Racek
2012-08-21 9:28 ` Tomas Racek
2012-08-22 9:54 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-22 9:54 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2012-08-22 9:54 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-22 10:03 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-08-22 10:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] x86, alternative: fix p6 nops on non-modular kernels Avi Kivity
2012-08-22 10:21 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/alternatives: Fix " tip-bot for Avi Kivity
2012-08-22 10:33 ` [PATCH] x86, alternative: fix " Tomas Racek
2012-08-22 10:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Tomas Racek
2012-08-22 10:33 ` Tomas Racek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5034AE84.90708@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=tracek@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.