All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit memory-mapped I/O operations
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:12:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50351304.20608@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345655343.2709.56.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>

On 08/22/2012 10:09 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> Well, sure, I'm assuming that the driver is responsible for checking
> that the device and its bus interface support an MMIO of the requested
> width.
>
> But the architecture code must be responsible for reporting whether the
> host supports it, right?
>

No, the architecture code *can't*.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-22 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-22  1:17 [PATCH 0/3] x86_64, sfc: 128-bit memory-mapped I/O Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit types for kernel code only Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit memory-mapped I/O operations Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:37   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  2:04     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  2:34       ` David Miller
2012-08-22  3:24         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  3:29           ` David Miller
2012-08-22  3:49             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  3:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  3:59             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  4:14               ` David Miller
2012-08-22 21:14                 ` David Miller
2012-08-22 21:28                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 21:38                     ` David Miller
2012-08-22  4:35               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  5:00                 ` David Miller
2012-08-22 14:06                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  4:42             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 13:26             ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:20               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 14:24                 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:30                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-08-22 14:58                     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 15:13                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:27                         ` David Laight
2012-08-22 15:49                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:51                           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 15:54                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 16:44                               ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 16:49                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 16:55                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 17:09                                   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:12                                     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-08-22 17:27                                       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:54                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 18:11                                           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 18:18                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 18:28                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 19:01                                               ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:26                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 16:51                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 16:59                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:51                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 14:50                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 14:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 15:05                       ` David Laight
2012-08-22 15:16                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 15:41                     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:42                 ` David Laight
2012-08-22  1:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] sfc: Use __raw_writeo() to perform TX descriptor push where possible Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64, sfc: 128-bit memory-mapped I/O H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  1:43   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:59     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  2:10       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  2:31         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50351304.20608@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.