All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit memory-mapped I/O operations
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:18:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50352265.3050203@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345659074.2709.80.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>

On 08/22/2012 11:11 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> Well the whole point of having the two 32-bit generic implementations is
> that hardware may care about the order!  How can it be right that a
> 64-bit implementation assumes it doesn't?
> 

On x86 platforms it is pretty much universal (as in: I have never seen
an exception) that transactions that are broken up are broken up in
littleendian order.  That was the original readq/writeq implementation
on x86-32, but it screwed up some other architectures.

The other reason to not have readq/writeq by default where we *know* it
can't be supported is that some drivers (e.g. the CNIC/OPA-2 driver I
mentioned) can do better, performance-wise, if it knows that.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-22 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-22  1:17 [PATCH 0/3] x86_64, sfc: 128-bit memory-mapped I/O Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit types for kernel code only Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit memory-mapped I/O operations Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:37   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  2:04     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  2:34       ` David Miller
2012-08-22  3:24         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  3:29           ` David Miller
2012-08-22  3:49             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  3:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  3:59             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  4:14               ` David Miller
2012-08-22 21:14                 ` David Miller
2012-08-22 21:28                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 21:38                     ` David Miller
2012-08-22  4:35               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  5:00                 ` David Miller
2012-08-22 14:06                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22  4:42             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 13:26             ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:20               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 14:24                 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:30                   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-08-22 14:58                     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 15:13                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:27                         ` David Laight
2012-08-22 15:49                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:51                           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 15:54                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 16:44                               ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 16:49                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 16:55                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 17:09                                   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:12                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 17:27                                       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:54                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 18:11                                           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 18:18                                             ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-08-22 18:28                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 19:01                                               ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 17:26                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 16:51                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 16:59                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 15:51                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22 14:50                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 14:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 15:05                       ` David Laight
2012-08-22 15:16                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-08-22 15:41                     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22 14:42                 ` David Laight
2012-08-22  1:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] sfc: Use __raw_writeo() to perform TX descriptor push where possible Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64, sfc: 128-bit memory-mapped I/O H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  1:43   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  1:59     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-08-22  2:10       ` Ben Hutchings
2012-08-22  2:31         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50352265.3050203@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.