All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/8] Per-user clock constraints
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:20:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5035317.536XV5BeWG@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408375833-10703-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>

Hi Tomeu,

Am Montag, 18. August 2014, 17:30:26 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso:
> Hi,
> 
> in this v7 of the patchset I have only rebased on top of 3.17rc1, with no
> other changes. I have had to do a fair amount of fixing due to the rebase,
> more details below. Follows the original cover letter blurb:
> 
> I'm retaking Rabin's patches [0] for splitting the clk API in two: one API
> for clk consumers and another for providers. The consumer API uses a clk
> structure that just keeps track of the consumer and has a reference to the
> actual clk_core struct, which is used internally.
> 
> I have kept a patch from Rabin that aims to aid in debugging nested
> enable/disable calls, though my personal aim is to allow more than one
> consumer to influence the final, effective frequency rate. For now this is
> limited to setting floor and ceiling constraints, with the short-term aim
> of allowing devfreq and thermal drivers to set floor and ceiling
> frequencies on the memory clock, respectively.

sounds interesting. I've tested your clk-refactoring-7 branch on a Rockchip 
rk3188-radxarock and rk3288-evb-rk808 board, so

Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>


Heiko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>,
	rabin@rab.in, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
	kever.yang@rock-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Per-user clock constraints
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:20:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5035317.536XV5BeWG@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408375833-10703-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>

Hi Tomeu,

Am Montag, 18. August 2014, 17:30:26 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso:
> Hi,
> 
> in this v7 of the patchset I have only rebased on top of 3.17rc1, with no
> other changes. I have had to do a fair amount of fixing due to the rebase,
> more details below. Follows the original cover letter blurb:
> 
> I'm retaking Rabin's patches [0] for splitting the clk API in two: one API
> for clk consumers and another for providers. The consumer API uses a clk
> structure that just keeps track of the consumer and has a reference to the
> actual clk_core struct, which is used internally.
> 
> I have kept a patch from Rabin that aims to aid in debugging nested
> enable/disable calls, though my personal aim is to allow more than one
> consumer to influence the final, effective frequency rate. For now this is
> limited to setting floor and ceiling constraints, with the short-term aim
> of allowing devfreq and thermal drivers to set floor and ceiling
> frequencies on the memory clock, respectively.

sounds interesting. I've tested your clk-refactoring-7 branch on a Rockchip 
rk3188-radxarock and rk3288-evb-rk808 board, so

Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>


Heiko


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-08-26 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-18 15:30 [PATCH v7 0/8] Per-user clock constraints Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] clk: Add temporary mapping to the existing API Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-20 14:50   ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-21 18:04     ` Tony Lindgren
2014-08-21 18:04       ` Tony Lindgren
2014-08-21 18:10       ` Jason Cooper
2014-08-21 18:10         ` Jason Cooper
2014-08-22  3:49         ` Simon Horman
2014-08-22  3:49           ` Simon Horman
2014-08-25  9:18         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-08-25  9:18           ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] clk: provide public clk_is_enabled function Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] cpufreq: kirkwood: Remove use of the clk provider API Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30   ` Tomeu Vizoso
     [not found]   ` <20140820225513.5251.284@quantum>
2014-08-21  7:53     ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-21  7:53       ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-21 13:38       ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-21 13:38         ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-22 19:29         ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-22 19:29           ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-22 20:11           ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-22 20:11             ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-22 20:27             ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-22 20:27               ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-26 21:46             ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-26 22:36               ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-26 22:36                 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-26 23:30                 ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-27  0:35                   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-27  0:35                     ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-27  5:04                     ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-27  5:04                       ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-27 15:58                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-27 15:58                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] ASoC: mxs-saif: fix mixed use of public and provider clk API Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] clk: use struct clk only for external API Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] clk: per-user clock accounting for debug Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-27 20:54   ` Mike Turquette
2014-08-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] clk: Add floor and ceiling constraints to clock rates Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-18 15:30   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-21  2:12 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Per-user clock constraints Andrew Lunn
2014-08-21  2:12   ` Andrew Lunn
2014-08-21  7:10   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-21  7:10     ` Tomeu Vizoso
2014-08-26 13:20 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2014-08-26 13:20   ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5035317.536XV5BeWG@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.