All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jason.wessel@windriver.com" <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Bail out of KGDB when we've been triggered
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:54:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50358D6E.20209@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6AE080B68D46FC4BA2D2769E68D765B7059AE7E7@039-SN2MPN1-022.039d.mgd.msft.net>

On 08/22/2012 11:07 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com> wrote:
> 
>> +int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       if (kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip))
>> +               return 1;
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
> 
> int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>         return !!kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip));
> }
> 
> If the caller only cares about zero vs. non-zero, you can drop the !!.

Yes, so 'return kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip);' is already fine and simple.

I'll update this as v2 so thanks your comment.

Tiejun

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@freescale.com>
Cc: "benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"jason.wessel@windriver.com" <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Bail out of KGDB when we've been triggered
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:54:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50358D6E.20209@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6AE080B68D46FC4BA2D2769E68D765B7059AE7E7@039-SN2MPN1-022.039d.mgd.msft.net>

On 08/22/2012 11:07 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@windriver.com> wrote:
> 
>> +int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       if (kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip))
>> +               return 1;
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
> 
> int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>         return !!kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip));
> }
> 
> If the caller only cares about zero vs. non-zero, you can drop the !!.

Yes, so 'return kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip);' is already fine and simple.

I'll update this as v2 so thanks your comment.

Tiejun

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-23  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-22 10:43 [PATCH 1/3] kgdb,ppc: do not set kgdb_single_step on ppc Tiejun Chen
2012-08-22 10:43 ` Tiejun Chen
2012-08-22 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Bail out of KGDB when we've been triggered Tiejun Chen
2012-08-22 10:43   ` Tiejun Chen
2012-08-22 15:07   ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-08-22 15:07     ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2012-08-23  1:54     ` tiejun.chen [this message]
2012-08-23  1:54       ` tiejun.chen
2012-08-22 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kgdb: restore current_thread_info properly Tiejun Chen
2012-08-22 10:43   ` Tiejun Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50358D6E.20209@windriver.com \
    --to=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
    --cc=B04825@freescale.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.