From: Philippe Nunes <philippe.nunes@linux.intel.com>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ussd: Recover idle state in case of response sending failure
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:15:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50374617.7050401@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50367059.9050406@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2181 bytes --]
On 08/23/2012 08:03 PM, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> On 08/23/2012 11:27 AM, Philippe Nunes wrote:
>> GCF test case 31.8.1.2.3 is rejecting the user response.
>> Any subsequent USSD notification are not handled because USSD is
>> always in
>> state user-action.
>> ---
>> src/ussd.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/ussd.c b/src/ussd.c
>> index 74888b2..21e0164 100644
>> --- a/src/ussd.c
>> +++ b/src/ussd.c
>> @@ -414,6 +414,18 @@ void ofono_ussd_notify(struct ofono_ussd *ussd,
>> int status, int dcs,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + if (status == OFONO_USSD_STATUS_TERMINATED&&
>> + (ussd->state == USSD_STATE_IDLE ||
>> + ussd->state == USSD_STATE_USER_ACTION)) {
>
> This check makes no sense, why bother checking for ussd->state ==
> USSD_STATE_IDLE?
The issue has been unveiled after a network initiated USSD request:
\r\n+CUSD: 1,"Type *70*635*562# and send",15\r\n
src/ussd.c:ofono_ussd_notify() status: 1 ACTION_REQUIRED, state: 0 IDLE
then we try to give an answer:
AT+CUSD=1,"*70*635*562#",15\r
\r\n+CUSD: 2\r\n
\r\n+CME ERROR: 100\r\n
I presume that the same error could occur after a user USSD request. In
this case, the state is still 'idle' and the "Terminated" notification
results in a "NotificationReceived" signal with a NULL string. To avoid
this, I need to check also for ussd->state == USSD_STATE_IDLE. That's
why the first version was for me more appropriate.
>
>> + ussd_change_state(ussd, USSD_STATE_IDLE);
>> +
>> + if (ussd->pending == NULL)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + reply = __ofono_error_not_supported(ussd->pending);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>
> I would handle it just like the 'Not Supported' case but with a new
> __ofono_error_network_terminated error reply. Or perhaps re-use
> __ofono_error_canceled.
In practice, I don't ever expect to send a reply since the
ussd_response_callback/ ussd_callback is invoked before the TERMINATED
notification. The error returned in the callback is __ofono_error_failed.
So, what about changing the state to 'idle' if not already set and
simply return?
Regards,
Philippe.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-24 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 16:27 [PATCH v2] call-forwarding: class applied is the class given by SS code Philippe Nunes
2012-08-23 16:27 ` [PATCH v2] ussd: Recover idle state in case of response sending failure Philippe Nunes
2012-08-23 18:03 ` Denis Kenzior
2012-08-24 9:15 ` Philippe Nunes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50374617.7050401@linux.intel.com \
--to=philippe.nunes@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.