* [meta-oe] udev without initscript
@ 2012-08-27 15:09 Simon Busch
2012-08-27 17:31 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Busch @ 2012-08-27 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hey everybody,
recently I discovered that the udev version provided by meta-oe doesn't
ship an initscript for sysvinit anymore where oe-core's version of udev
still does. Is there a specific cause for this or is it just as
everybody uses systemd theses days with meta-oe instead of sysvinit?
If there is not specific cause I will provide a patch to the initscript
back for the versions of udev in meta-oe.
regards,
Simon
--
Simon Busch - http://mm.gravedo.de/blog/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-oe] udev without initscript
2012-08-27 15:09 [meta-oe] udev without initscript Simon Busch
@ 2012-08-27 17:31 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-27 17:38 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2012-08-27 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Simon Busch <morphis@gravedo.de> wrote:
>
> recently I discovered that the udev version provided by meta-oe doesn't
> ship an initscript for sysvinit anymore where oe-core's version of udev
> still does. Is there a specific cause for this or is it just as
> everybody uses systemd theses days with meta-oe instead of sysvinit?
>
I guess people just use systemd since it was entwined in meta-oe before it spun
into its own layer.
> If there is not specific cause I will provide a patch to the initscript
> back for the versions of udev in meta-oe.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-oe] udev without initscript
2012-08-27 17:31 ` Khem Raj
@ 2012-08-27 17:38 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-08-27 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Busch; +Cc: openembedded-devel
On Monday 27 August 2012 10:31:30 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Simon Busch <morphis@gravedo.de> wrote:
> > recently I discovered that the udev version provided by meta-oe doesn't
> > ship an initscript for sysvinit anymore where oe-core's version of udev
> > still does. Is there a specific cause for this or is it just as
> > everybody uses systemd theses days with meta-oe instead of sysvinit?
>
> I guess people just use systemd since it was entwined in meta-oe before it
> spun into its own layer.
Sounds like something that ought to be fixed. FYI however I believe there is a
plan to update udev in OE-Core pretty soon, which will definitely include an
init script if appropriate - not sure what the status of that is though.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-27 17:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-27 15:09 [meta-oe] udev without initscript Simon Busch
2012-08-27 17:31 ` Khem Raj
2012-08-27 17:38 ` Paul Eggleton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.