From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5048BD7A.7060408@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345614150-25723-3-git-send-email-omar.luna@linaro.org>
Hi Omar,
On 08/22/2012 07:42 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> For a reset sequence to complete cleanly, a module needs its
> associated clocks to be enabled, otherwise the timeout check
> in prcm code can print a false failure (failed to hardreset)
> that occurs because the clocks aren't powered ON and the status
> bit checked can't transition without them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> index eaedc33..b65e021 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> @@ -1509,6 +1509,7 @@ static int _deassert_hardreset(struct omap_hwmod *oh, const char *name)
> {
> struct omap_hwmod_rst_info ohri;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
> + int hwsup = 0;
>
> if (!oh)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1520,10 +1521,46 @@ static int _deassert_hardreset(struct omap_hwmod *oh, const char *name)
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
> return ret;
>
> + if (oh->clkdm) {
> + /*
> + * A clockdomain must be in SW_SUP otherwise reset
> + * might not be completed. The clockdomain can be set
> + * in HW_AUTO only when the module become ready.
> + */
> + hwsup = clkdm_in_hwsup(oh->clkdm);
> + ret = clkdm_hwmod_enable(oh->clkdm, oh);
> + if (ret) {>
> + WARN(1, "omap_hwmod: %s: could not enable clockdomain %s: %d\n",
> + oh->name, oh->clkdm->name, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + _enable_clocks(oh);
> + if (soc_ops.enable_module)
> + soc_ops.enable_module(oh);
> +
> ret = soc_ops.deassert_hardreset(oh, &ohri);
> +
> + if (soc_ops.disable_module)
> + soc_ops.disable_module(oh);
> + _disable_clocks(oh);
> +
> if (ret == -EBUSY)
> pr_warning("omap_hwmod: %s: failed to hardreset\n", oh->name);
>
> + if (!ret) {
> + /*
> + * Set the clockdomain to HW_AUTO, assuming that the
> + * previous state was HW_AUTO.
> + */
> + if (oh->clkdm && hwsup)
> + clkdm_allow_idle(oh->clkdm);
> + } else {
> + if (oh->clkdm)
> + clkdm_hwmod_disable(oh->clkdm, oh);
> + }
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
The sequence is good, I'm just a little bit concern about the
duplication of code compared to _enable sequence.
That being said, this is the consequence of removing the hardreset
sequence outside of the main _enable/_shutdown sequence.
So I'm not sure I have any better way of doing that :-(
Regards,
Benoit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Benoit Cousson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5048BD7A.7060408@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345614150-25723-3-git-send-email-omar.luna@linaro.org>
Hi Omar,
On 08/22/2012 07:42 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> For a reset sequence to complete cleanly, a module needs its
> associated clocks to be enabled, otherwise the timeout check
> in prcm code can print a false failure (failed to hardreset)
> that occurs because the clocks aren't powered ON and the status
> bit checked can't transition without them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> index eaedc33..b65e021 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> @@ -1509,6 +1509,7 @@ static int _deassert_hardreset(struct omap_hwmod *oh, const char *name)
> {
> struct omap_hwmod_rst_info ohri;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
> + int hwsup = 0;
>
> if (!oh)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1520,10 +1521,46 @@ static int _deassert_hardreset(struct omap_hwmod *oh, const char *name)
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
> return ret;
>
> + if (oh->clkdm) {
> + /*
> + * A clockdomain must be in SW_SUP otherwise reset
> + * might not be completed. The clockdomain can be set
> + * in HW_AUTO only when the module become ready.
> + */
> + hwsup = clkdm_in_hwsup(oh->clkdm);
> + ret = clkdm_hwmod_enable(oh->clkdm, oh);
> + if (ret) {>
> + WARN(1, "omap_hwmod: %s: could not enable clockdomain %s: %d\n",
> + oh->name, oh->clkdm->name, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + _enable_clocks(oh);
> + if (soc_ops.enable_module)
> + soc_ops.enable_module(oh);
> +
> ret = soc_ops.deassert_hardreset(oh, &ohri);
> +
> + if (soc_ops.disable_module)
> + soc_ops.disable_module(oh);
> + _disable_clocks(oh);
> +
> if (ret == -EBUSY)
> pr_warning("omap_hwmod: %s: failed to hardreset\n", oh->name);
>
> + if (!ret) {
> + /*
> + * Set the clockdomain to HW_AUTO, assuming that the
> + * previous state was HW_AUTO.
> + */
> + if (oh->clkdm && hwsup)
> + clkdm_allow_idle(oh->clkdm);
> + } else {
> + if (oh->clkdm)
> + clkdm_hwmod_disable(oh->clkdm, oh);
> + }
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
The sequence is good, I'm just a little bit concern about the
duplication of code compared to _enable sequence.
That being said, this is the consequence of removing the hardreset
sequence outside of the main _enable/_shutdown sequence.
So I'm not sure I have any better way of doing that :-(
Regards,
Benoit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5048BD7A.7060408@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345614150-25723-3-git-send-email-omar.luna@linaro.org>
Hi Omar,
On 08/22/2012 07:42 AM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> For a reset sequence to complete cleanly, a module needs its
> associated clocks to be enabled, otherwise the timeout check
> in prcm code can print a false failure (failed to hardreset)
> that occurs because the clocks aren't powered ON and the status
> bit checked can't transition without them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> index eaedc33..b65e021 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> @@ -1509,6 +1509,7 @@ static int _deassert_hardreset(struct omap_hwmod *oh, const char *name)
> {
> struct omap_hwmod_rst_info ohri;
> int ret = -EINVAL;
> + int hwsup = 0;
>
> if (!oh)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1520,10 +1521,46 @@ static int _deassert_hardreset(struct omap_hwmod *oh, const char *name)
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
> return ret;
>
> + if (oh->clkdm) {
> + /*
> + * A clockdomain must be in SW_SUP otherwise reset
> + * might not be completed. The clockdomain can be set
> + * in HW_AUTO only when the module become ready.
> + */
> + hwsup = clkdm_in_hwsup(oh->clkdm);
> + ret = clkdm_hwmod_enable(oh->clkdm, oh);
> + if (ret) {>
> + WARN(1, "omap_hwmod: %s: could not enable clockdomain %s: %d\n",
> + oh->name, oh->clkdm->name, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + _enable_clocks(oh);
> + if (soc_ops.enable_module)
> + soc_ops.enable_module(oh);
> +
> ret = soc_ops.deassert_hardreset(oh, &ohri);
> +
> + if (soc_ops.disable_module)
> + soc_ops.disable_module(oh);
> + _disable_clocks(oh);
> +
> if (ret == -EBUSY)
> pr_warning("omap_hwmod: %s: failed to hardreset\n", oh->name);
>
> + if (!ret) {
> + /*
> + * Set the clockdomain to HW_AUTO, assuming that the
> + * previous state was HW_AUTO.
> + */
> + if (oh->clkdm && hwsup)
> + clkdm_allow_idle(oh->clkdm);
> + } else {
> + if (oh->clkdm)
> + clkdm_hwmod_disable(oh->clkdm, oh);
> + }
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
The sequence is good, I'm just a little bit concern about the
duplication of code compared to _enable sequence.
That being said, this is the consequence of removing the hardreset
sequence outside of the main _enable/_shutdown sequence.
So I'm not sure I have any better way of doing that :-(
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 5:42 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: hwmod: fix hardreset handling Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-08-22 5:42 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-08-22 5:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: partially un-reset hwmods might not be properly enabled Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-08-22 5:42 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-08-22 5:42 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-09-21 0:44 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-21 0:44 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-08-22 5:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: revise deassert sequence Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-08-22 5:42 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-09-06 15:12 ` Benoit Cousson [this message]
2012-09-06 15:12 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-09-06 15:12 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-09-10 17:14 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-09-10 17:14 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-09-21 0:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-21 0:45 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-03 14:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: hwmod: fix hardreset handling Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-09-03 14:29 ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-09-06 15:16 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-09-06 15:16 ` Benoit Cousson
2012-09-06 15:16 ` Benoit Cousson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5048BD7A.7060408@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=omar.luna@linaro.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.