From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Dmitry Lifshitz <lifshitz@compulab.co.il>,
"Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@ti.com>
Subject: Re: OMAP baseline test results for v3.6-rc4
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:52:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504999AB.6020703@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1209051523340.11516@utopia.booyaka.com>
On 09/05/12 18:44, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Here are some basic boot and power management test results for v3.6-rc4:
>
> http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.6-rc4/20120904122415/
>
> Some observations:
>
[...]
> * CM-T3517: L3 in-band error with USB OTG during boot
> - Cause unknown; longstanding issue; does not occur on the 3517EVM
We see this problem on several cm-t3517, but not all of them.
It looks something like:
--------------------cut----------------------------
NET: Registered protocol family 16
GPMC revision 5.0
gpmc: irq-20 could not claim: err -22
OMAP GPIO hardware version 2.5
In-band Error seen by USB_OTG at address 0
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at /home/lifshitz/workroot/git-repo/linux-cm-t3x/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_l3_smx.c:162 omap3_l3_app_irq+0xdc/0x120()
Modules linked in:
[<c001ad08>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c003f670>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64)
[<c003f670>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c003f6a4>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
[<c003f6a4>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0033af0>] (omap3_l3_app_irq+0xdc/0x120)
[<c0033af0>] (omap3_l3_app_irq+0xdc/0x120) from [<c008b8bc>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0xac/0x298)
[<c008b8bc>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0xac/0x298) from [<c008bafc>] (handle_irq_event+0x54/0x74)
[<c008bafc>] (handle_irq_event+0x54/0x74) from [<c008e290>] (handle_level_irq+0xc4/0x118)
[<c008e290>] (handle_level_irq+0xc4/0x118) from [<c008b3ac>] (generic_handle_irq+0x2c/0x44)
[<c008b3ac>] (generic_handle_irq+0x2c/0x44) from [<c001500c>] (handle_IRQ+0x60/0x80)
[<c001500c>] (handle_IRQ+0x60/0x80) from [<c00085ec>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x60/0x74)
[<c00085ec>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x60/0x74) from [<c04e3100>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x74)
Exception stack(0xcf02de00 to 0xcf02de48)
de00: 00000000 0000000a 00000000 00000021 c074bcac cf046280 0000000a 60000013
de20: c074bcdc c070020c 00010000 00000000 00000000 cf02de48 00000000 c008c988
de40: 40000013 ffffffff
[<c04e3100>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x74) from [<c008c988>] (__setup_irq+0x2a8/0x404)
[<c008c988>] (__setup_irq+0x2a8/0x404) from [<c008cd18>] (request_threaded_irq+0xe8/0x13c)
[<c008cd18>] (request_threaded_irq+0xe8/0x13c) from [<c06c3d24>] (omap3_l3_probe+0x10c/0x16c)
[<c06c3d24>] (omap3_l3_probe+0x10c/0x16c) from [<c033586c>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c)
[<c033586c>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c) from [<c0334414>] (really_probe+0xac/0x1c8)
[<c0334414>] (really_probe+0xac/0x1c8) from [<c0334578>] (driver_probe_device+0x48/0x60)
[<c0334578>] (driver_probe_device+0x48/0x60) from [<c03345f0>] (__driver_attach+0x60/0x84)
[<c03345f0>] (__driver_attach+0x60/0x84) from [<c0332ce0>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x4c/0x80)
[<c0332ce0>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x4c/0x80) from [<c0333414>] (bus_add_driver+0xa4/0x294)
[<c0333414>] (bus_add_driver+0xa4/0x294) from [<c0334bdc>] (driver_register+0xa4/0x188)
[<c0334bdc>] (driver_register+0xa4/0x188) from [<c0335c5c>] (platform_driver_probe+0x18/0x98)
[<c0335c5c>] (platform_driver_probe+0x18/0x98) from [<c0008798>] (do_one_initcall+0xac/0x16c)
[<c0008798>] (do_one_initcall+0xac/0x16c) from [<c06b52ac>] (do_basic_setup+0x88/0xc0)
[<c06b52ac>] (do_basic_setup+0x88/0xc0) from [<c06b53c4>] (kernel_init+0x60/0xfc)
[<c06b53c4>] (kernel_init+0x60/0xfc) from [<c00150a4>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
-----------------------------cut-------------------------------
After that, the board continues to function properly.
Any hints how to debug this?
[...]
>
> (The objective in posting these is to determine what is and isn't working
> in the mainline releases, as well as to make it easier to determine what
> is fixed or is broken by subsequent series that use this as a base.)
Thanks for doing this.
--
Regards,
Igor.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: grinberg@compulab.co.il (Igor Grinberg)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: OMAP baseline test results for v3.6-rc4
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:52:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <504999AB.6020703@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1209051523340.11516@utopia.booyaka.com>
On 09/05/12 18:44, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Here are some basic boot and power management test results for v3.6-rc4:
>
> http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v3.6-rc4/20120904122415/
>
> Some observations:
>
[...]
> * CM-T3517: L3 in-band error with USB OTG during boot
> - Cause unknown; longstanding issue; does not occur on the 3517EVM
We see this problem on several cm-t3517, but not all of them.
It looks something like:
--------------------cut----------------------------
NET: Registered protocol family 16
GPMC revision 5.0
gpmc: irq-20 could not claim: err -22
OMAP GPIO hardware version 2.5
In-band Error seen by USB_OTG at address 0
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at /home/lifshitz/workroot/git-repo/linux-cm-t3x/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_l3_smx.c:162 omap3_l3_app_irq+0xdc/0x120()
Modules linked in:
[<c001ad08>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c003f670>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64)
[<c003f670>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c003f6a4>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24)
[<c003f6a4>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) from [<c0033af0>] (omap3_l3_app_irq+0xdc/0x120)
[<c0033af0>] (omap3_l3_app_irq+0xdc/0x120) from [<c008b8bc>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0xac/0x298)
[<c008b8bc>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0xac/0x298) from [<c008bafc>] (handle_irq_event+0x54/0x74)
[<c008bafc>] (handle_irq_event+0x54/0x74) from [<c008e290>] (handle_level_irq+0xc4/0x118)
[<c008e290>] (handle_level_irq+0xc4/0x118) from [<c008b3ac>] (generic_handle_irq+0x2c/0x44)
[<c008b3ac>] (generic_handle_irq+0x2c/0x44) from [<c001500c>] (handle_IRQ+0x60/0x80)
[<c001500c>] (handle_IRQ+0x60/0x80) from [<c00085ec>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x60/0x74)
[<c00085ec>] (omap3_intc_handle_irq+0x60/0x74) from [<c04e3100>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x74)
Exception stack(0xcf02de00 to 0xcf02de48)
de00: 00000000 0000000a 00000000 00000021 c074bcac cf046280 0000000a 60000013
de20: c074bcdc c070020c 00010000 00000000 00000000 cf02de48 00000000 c008c988
de40: 40000013 ffffffff
[<c04e3100>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x74) from [<c008c988>] (__setup_irq+0x2a8/0x404)
[<c008c988>] (__setup_irq+0x2a8/0x404) from [<c008cd18>] (request_threaded_irq+0xe8/0x13c)
[<c008cd18>] (request_threaded_irq+0xe8/0x13c) from [<c06c3d24>] (omap3_l3_probe+0x10c/0x16c)
[<c06c3d24>] (omap3_l3_probe+0x10c/0x16c) from [<c033586c>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c)
[<c033586c>] (platform_drv_probe+0x18/0x1c) from [<c0334414>] (really_probe+0xac/0x1c8)
[<c0334414>] (really_probe+0xac/0x1c8) from [<c0334578>] (driver_probe_device+0x48/0x60)
[<c0334578>] (driver_probe_device+0x48/0x60) from [<c03345f0>] (__driver_attach+0x60/0x84)
[<c03345f0>] (__driver_attach+0x60/0x84) from [<c0332ce0>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x4c/0x80)
[<c0332ce0>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x4c/0x80) from [<c0333414>] (bus_add_driver+0xa4/0x294)
[<c0333414>] (bus_add_driver+0xa4/0x294) from [<c0334bdc>] (driver_register+0xa4/0x188)
[<c0334bdc>] (driver_register+0xa4/0x188) from [<c0335c5c>] (platform_driver_probe+0x18/0x98)
[<c0335c5c>] (platform_driver_probe+0x18/0x98) from [<c0008798>] (do_one_initcall+0xac/0x16c)
[<c0008798>] (do_one_initcall+0xac/0x16c) from [<c06b52ac>] (do_basic_setup+0x88/0xc0)
[<c06b52ac>] (do_basic_setup+0x88/0xc0) from [<c06b53c4>] (kernel_init+0x60/0xfc)
[<c06b53c4>] (kernel_init+0x60/0xfc) from [<c00150a4>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed1c ]---
-----------------------------cut-------------------------------
After that, the board continues to function properly.
Any hints how to debug this?
[...]
>
> (The objective in posting these is to determine what is and isn't working
> in the mainline releases, as well as to make it easier to determine what
> is fixed or is broken by subsequent series that use this as a base.)
Thanks for doing this.
--
Regards,
Igor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-07 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 15:44 OMAP baseline test results for v3.6-rc4 Paul Walmsley
2012-09-05 15:44 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-07 6:52 ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
2012-09-07 6:52 ` Igor Grinberg
2012-09-22 18:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-22 18:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-23 6:36 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-23 6:36 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-07 23:01 ` Andreas Müller
2012-09-07 23:52 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=504999AB.6020703@compulab.co.il \
--to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=lifshitz@compulab.co.il \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.