From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
To: Girish Verma <girish@circuitsutra.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq funct
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:46:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5049D07C.8010403@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346946453.5012.1.camel@cst-girish-laptop>
Hello.
On 06-09-2012 19:47, Girish Verma wrote:
> Resending patch with latest kernel code:
That comment should have been put after the --- tear line.
> In xhci-ring.c, function inc_enq and inc_deq calculate the dma address
> of trb but never used.
> Signed-off-by: Girish Verma <girish@circuitsutra.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 4 ----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index 643c2f3..5c5c47b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ static void next_trb(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> */
> static void inc_deq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_ring *ring)
> {
> - unsigned long long addr;
>
> ring->deq_updates++;
>
> @@ -176,7 +175,6 @@ static void inc_deq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> xhci_ring *ring)
> }
> } while (last_trb(xhci, ring, ring->deq_seg, ring->dequeue));
>
> - addr = (unsigned long long) xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(ring->deq_seg,
> ring->dequeue);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -201,7 +199,6 @@ static void inc_enq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> xhci_ring *ring,
> {
> u32 chain;
> union xhci_trb *next;
> - unsigned long long addr;
>
> chain = le32_to_cpu(ring->enqueue->generic.field[3]) & TRB_CHAIN;
> /* If this is not event ring, there is one less usable TRB */
> @@ -253,7 +250,6 @@ static void inc_enq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> xhci_ring *ring,
> ring->enqueue = ring->enq_seg->trbs;
> next = ring->enqueue;
> }
> - addr = (unsigned long long) xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(ring->enq_seg,
> ring->enqueue);
The patch is line wrapped. Should be easy to fix by hand when applying
though...
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
To: Girish Verma <girish@circuitsutra.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq function
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:46:20 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5049D07C.8010403@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346946453.5012.1.camel@cst-girish-laptop>
Hello.
On 06-09-2012 19:47, Girish Verma wrote:
> Resending patch with latest kernel code:
That comment should have been put after the --- tear line.
> In xhci-ring.c, function inc_enq and inc_deq calculate the dma address
> of trb but never used.
> Signed-off-by: Girish Verma <girish@circuitsutra.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 4 ----
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index 643c2f3..5c5c47b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ static void next_trb(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> */
> static void inc_deq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_ring *ring)
> {
> - unsigned long long addr;
>
> ring->deq_updates++;
>
> @@ -176,7 +175,6 @@ static void inc_deq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> xhci_ring *ring)
> }
> } while (last_trb(xhci, ring, ring->deq_seg, ring->dequeue));
>
> - addr = (unsigned long long) xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(ring->deq_seg,
> ring->dequeue);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -201,7 +199,6 @@ static void inc_enq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> xhci_ring *ring,
> {
> u32 chain;
> union xhci_trb *next;
> - unsigned long long addr;
>
> chain = le32_to_cpu(ring->enqueue->generic.field[3]) & TRB_CHAIN;
> /* If this is not event ring, there is one less usable TRB */
> @@ -253,7 +250,6 @@ static void inc_enq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct
> xhci_ring *ring,
> ring->enqueue = ring->enq_seg->trbs;
> next = ring->enqueue;
> }
> - addr = (unsigned long long) xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(ring->enq_seg,
> ring->enqueue);
The patch is line wrapped. Should be easy to fix by hand when applying
though...
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-07 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-13 15:29 [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq function Girish Verma
2012-05-13 15:41 ` Girish Verma
2012-09-05 22:47 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq funct Sarah Sharp
2012-09-05 22:47 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq function Sarah Sharp
2012-09-06 15:47 ` Girish Verma
2012-09-06 15:59 ` Girish Verma
2012-09-06 18:28 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq funct Sarah Sharp
2012-09-06 18:28 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq function Sarah Sharp
2012-11-11 23:36 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq funct Yuhong Bao
2012-11-11 23:36 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq function Yuhong Bao
2012-09-07 10:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2012-09-07 10:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-13 1:06 Girish Verma
2012-05-13 1:18 ` Girish Verma
2012-05-13 13:34 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq funct Sergei Shtylyov
2012-05-13 13:34 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq function Sergei Shtylyov
2012-05-13 14:00 ` Girish Verma
2012-05-13 14:12 ` [PATCH] USB: XHCI: xhci-ring: Remove unused dma address calculation in inc_enq and inc_deq funct Girish Verma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5049D07C.8010403@mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
--cc=girish@circuitsutra.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.