Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk

[Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>]

On 11/09/12 16:39, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:31 PM Felipe Balbi wrote
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:59:11PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>> This patch uses pr_* instead of printk.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c |    6 +++---
>>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
>>> index ba126cc..e38d990 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
>>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
>>>  #ifndef DEBUG_GPIO
>>>  #define gpio_dbg(x...) do { } while (0)
>>>  #else
>>> -#define gpio_dbg(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x)
>>> +#define gpio_dbg(x...) pr_debug(x)
>>>  #endif
>>>
>>>  int samsung_gpio_setpull_updown(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
>>> @@ -926,10 +926,10 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip)
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>>>  	if (chip->pm != NULL) {
>>>  		if (!chip->pm->save || !chip->pm->resume)
>>> -			printk(KERN_ERR "gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
>>> +			pr_err("gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n",
>>>  			       gc->label);
>>
>> I would rather see dev_* conversion instead.
>>
>> my 2 cents
> 
> Hi Felipe Balbi,
> 
> OK, I will replace printk(KERN_ERR...) with dev_err.
> Thank you.

I was going to suggest that also, but I don't think that there is a dev
pointer to use. The gpio_chip structure has an optional one, but from my
quick glance it didn't look like the Samsung driver was using it. I
could be wrong though. If I am, go with dev_err (and dev_dbg for
replacing the gpio_dbg statements).

~Ryan