From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thp: move release mmap_sem lock out of khugepaged_alloc_page
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:16:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5051A481.3090901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120912151844.a2f17f98.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 09/13/2012 06:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:56:41 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> To make the code more clear, move release the lock out of khugepaged_alloc_page
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -1854,11 +1854,6 @@ static struct page
>> *hpage = alloc_hugepage_vma(khugepaged_defrag(), vma, address,
>> node, __GFP_OTHER_NODE);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * After allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock in
>> - * preparation for taking it in write mode.
>> - */
>> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> if (unlikely(!*hpage)) {
>> count_vm_event(THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED);
>> *hpage = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> @@ -1905,7 +1900,6 @@ static struct page
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> int node)
>> {
>> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> VM_BUG_ON(!*hpage);
>> return *hpage;
>> }
>> @@ -1931,8 +1925,14 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>
>> VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>>
>> - /* release the mmap_sem read lock. */
>> new_page = khugepaged_alloc_page(hpage, mm, vma, address, node);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * After allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock in
>> + * preparation for taking it in write mode.
>> + */
>> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> +
>> if (!new_page)
>> return;
>
> Well that's a pretty minor improvement: one still has to go off on a
> big hunt to locate the matching down_read().
>
> And the patch will increase mmap_sem hold times by a teeny amount. Do
> we really want to do this?
Andrew,
This is why i did in the previous patch (the lock is released in alloc function),
but as you noticed, this is really teeny overload after this patch - only increase
the load of count_vm_event() which operates a cpu-local variable. And, before i
posted this patch, i did kerbench test, no regression was found.
The another approach is, let the function name indicate the lock will be released,
how about just change the function name to khugepaged_alloc_page_release_lock?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thp: move release mmap_sem lock out of khugepaged_alloc_page
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:16:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5051A481.3090901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120912151844.a2f17f98.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 09/13/2012 06:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:56:41 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> To make the code more clear, move release the lock out of khugepaged_alloc_page
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -1854,11 +1854,6 @@ static struct page
>> *hpage = alloc_hugepage_vma(khugepaged_defrag(), vma, address,
>> node, __GFP_OTHER_NODE);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * After allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock in
>> - * preparation for taking it in write mode.
>> - */
>> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> if (unlikely(!*hpage)) {
>> count_vm_event(THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED);
>> *hpage = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> @@ -1905,7 +1900,6 @@ static struct page
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> int node)
>> {
>> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> VM_BUG_ON(!*hpage);
>> return *hpage;
>> }
>> @@ -1931,8 +1925,14 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>
>> VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>>
>> - /* release the mmap_sem read lock. */
>> new_page = khugepaged_alloc_page(hpage, mm, vma, address, node);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * After allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock in
>> + * preparation for taking it in write mode.
>> + */
>> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> +
>> if (!new_page)
>> return;
>
> Well that's a pretty minor improvement: one still has to go off on a
> big hunt to locate the matching down_read().
>
> And the patch will increase mmap_sem hold times by a teeny amount. Do
> we really want to do this?
Andrew,
This is why i did in the previous patch (the lock is released in alloc function),
but as you noticed, this is really teeny overload after this patch - only increase
the load of count_vm_event() which operates a cpu-local variable. And, before i
posted this patch, i did kerbench test, no regression was found.
The another approach is, let the function name indicate the lock will be released,
how about just change the function name to khugepaged_alloc_page_release_lock?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 12:55 [PATCH 0/3] thp: tidy and fix khugepaged_prealloc_page Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] thp: fix forgetting to reset the page alloc indicator Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] thp: move release mmap_sem lock out of khugepaged_alloc_page Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-12 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-13 9:16 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-09-13 9:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] thp: introduce khugepaged_cleanup_page Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5051A481.3090901@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.