All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sachin Kamat
	<sachin.kamat-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	Balbir Singh
	<bsingharora-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
	<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: Remove duplicate inclusion of sock.h file
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:32:45 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5052EBAD.6060202@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120914082741.GC28039-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>

On 09/14/2012 12:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 14-09-12 13:28:07, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> Has this patch been accepted?
> 
> Not yet. I am waiting for Glauber to ack it.
> 

I am fine with the change, assuming you tested it, after you made the
change I requested.

>>
>> On 12 September 2012 18:39, Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed 12-09-12 14:56:47, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> On Wed 12-09-12 12:50:41, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> index 795e525..85ec9ff 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>>>>>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>>  #include <net/sock.h>
>>>>>>> +#include <net/ip.h>
>>>>>>>  #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>>>>>>>          struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
>>>>>>>          spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>>          struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>>>>>>>  #endif
>>>>>>>  };
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are changing this, why not test for both? This field will be
>>>>> useless with inet disabled. I usually don't like conditional in
>>>>> structures (note that the "kmem" res counter in my patchsets is not
>>>>> conditional to KMEM!!), but since the decision was made to make this one
>>>>> conditional, I think INET is a much better test. I am fine with both though.
>>>>
>>>>  You are right of course. Updated patch bellow:
>>>
>>> Bahh. And I managed to send a different patch than I tested...
>>> ---
>>> From 0617ff7114bdf424160a8f1533784c837d426ec2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:38:42 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: clean up networking headers file inclusion
>>>
>>> Memory controller doesn't need anything from the networking stack unless
>>> CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is selected.
>>> Now we are including net/sock.h and net/tcp_memcontrol.h unconditionally
>>> which is not necessary. Moreover struct mem_cgroup contains tcp_mem even
>>> if CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not selected which is not necessary.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/memcontrol.c |    8 +++++---
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> index 795e525..1a217b4 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>>>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>> +
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
>>>  #include <net/sock.h>
>>> +#include <net/ip.h>
>>>  #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>>>         struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
>>>         spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
>>>         struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>>>  #endif
>>>  };
>>> @@ -413,8 +417,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *s)
>>>
>>>  /* Writing them here to avoid exposing memcg's inner layout */
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>> -#include <net/sock.h>
>>> -#include <net/ip.h>
>>>
>>>  static bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>>>  void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
>>> --
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michal Hocko
>>> SUSE Labs
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> With warm regards,
>> Sachin
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: Remove duplicate inclusion of sock.h file
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:32:45 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5052EBAD.6060202@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120914082741.GC28039@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 09/14/2012 12:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 14-09-12 13:28:07, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> Has this patch been accepted?
> 
> Not yet. I am waiting for Glauber to ack it.
> 

I am fine with the change, assuming you tested it, after you made the
change I requested.

>>
>> On 12 September 2012 18:39, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
>>> On Wed 12-09-12 14:56:47, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> On Wed 12-09-12 12:50:41, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> index 795e525..85ec9ff 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>>>>>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>>>>>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>>  #include <net/sock.h>
>>>>>>> +#include <net/ip.h>
>>>>>>>  #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>>>>>>>          struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
>>>>>>>          spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>>          struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>>>>>>>  #endif
>>>>>>>  };
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are changing this, why not test for both? This field will be
>>>>> useless with inet disabled. I usually don't like conditional in
>>>>> structures (note that the "kmem" res counter in my patchsets is not
>>>>> conditional to KMEM!!), but since the decision was made to make this one
>>>>> conditional, I think INET is a much better test. I am fine with both though.
>>>>
>>>>  You are right of course. Updated patch bellow:
>>>
>>> Bahh. And I managed to send a different patch than I tested...
>>> ---
>>> From 0617ff7114bdf424160a8f1533784c837d426ec2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:38:42 +0200
>>> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: clean up networking headers file inclusion
>>>
>>> Memory controller doesn't need anything from the networking stack unless
>>> CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is selected.
>>> Now we are including net/sock.h and net/tcp_memcontrol.h unconditionally
>>> which is not necessary. Moreover struct mem_cgroup contains tcp_mem even
>>> if CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is not selected which is not necessary.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
>>> ---
>>>  mm/memcontrol.c |    8 +++++---
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> index 795e525..1a217b4 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>>>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>  #include <linux/oom.h>
>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>> +
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
>>>  #include <net/sock.h>
>>> +#include <net/ip.h>
>>>  #include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>>>         struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu nocpu_base;
>>>         spinlock_t pcp_counter_lock;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_INET
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) && defined(CONFIG_INET)
>>>         struct tcp_memcontrol tcp_mem;
>>>  #endif
>>>  };
>>> @@ -413,8 +417,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_css(struct cgroup_subsys_state *s)
>>>
>>>  /* Writing them here to avoid exposing memcg's inner layout */
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>> -#include <net/sock.h>
>>> -#include <net/ip.h>
>>>
>>>  static bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>>>  void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
>>> --
>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michal Hocko
>>> SUSE Labs
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> With warm regards,
>> Sachin
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-14  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-11  8:08 [PATCH] mm/memcontrol.c: Remove duplicate inclusion of sock.h file Sachin Kamat
2012-09-11  9:52 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-11  9:52   ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]   ` <20120911095200.GB8058-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12  3:39     ` Sachin Kamat
2012-09-12  3:39       ` Sachin Kamat
2012-09-12  7:25     ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-12  7:25       ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]       ` <20120912072520.GB17516-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12  8:50         ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-12  8:50           ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]           ` <50504CE1.8030509-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12 12:56             ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-12 12:56               ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]               ` <20120912125647.GH21579-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-12 13:09                 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-12 13:09                   ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]                   ` <20120912130935.GJ21579-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14  7:58                     ` Sachin Kamat
2012-09-14  7:58                       ` Sachin Kamat
     [not found]                       ` <CAK9yfHwMnC65BvY3RG7duf_Cmt5hf1VLV=vZRag4Mm6nHdQ-GA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14  8:27                         ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-14  8:27                           ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]                           ` <20120914082741.GC28039-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14  8:32                             ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2012-09-14  8:32                               ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]                               ` <5052EBAD.6060202-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14  9:56                                 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-14  9:56                                   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5052EBAD.6060202@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer-bzqdu9zft3wakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bsingharora-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sachin.kamat-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.