From: francescolavra.fl@gmail.com (Francesco Lavra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500 fg
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:50:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50545D5D.6010101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB4BAkvdwEDViLGXfHHzYjkoL6qPZca2dzOin3GhBrqRJ3xNAg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 09/10/2012 11:44 AM, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
...
> +static int __devinit
> +fg_of_probe(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *np,
> + struct abx500_bm_plat_data *bm_pdata)
> +{
> + u8 val;
> + u32 pval;
> + int i;
> + int ext_thermister, lion_battery, ret = 0;
> + const char *bm_dev_name;
> + struct abx500_fg_platform_data *fg = bm_pdata->fg;
> + struct abx500_bm_data *bat;
> + struct abx500_battery_type *btype;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num_supplicants", &pval);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing property num_supplicants\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto inval_pval;
> + }
> + fg->num_supplicants = pval;
> + fg->supplied_to =
> + devm_kzalloc(dev, fg->num_supplicants *
> + sizeof(const char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (fg->supplied_to == NULL) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s no mem for supplied_to\n", __func__);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto inval_pval;
> + }
> + for (val = 0; val < fg->num_supplicants; ++val)
> + if (of_property_read_string_index
> + (np, "supplied_to", val, &bm_dev_name) == 0)
> + *(fg->supplied_to + val) = (char *)bm_dev_name;
> + else {
> + dev_err(dev, "insufficient number of supplied_to data found\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_dev_mem;
> + }
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "thermister_on_batctrl", &pval);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing property thermister_on_batctrl\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_dev_mem;
> + }
> + bm_pdata->battery = &ab8500_bm_data;
> + bat = bm_pdata->battery;
> + ext_thermister = 0;
> + if (pval == 0) {
> + bat->n_btypes = 4;
> + bat->bat_type = bat_type_ext_thermister;
> + bat->adc_therm = ABx500_ADC_THERM_BATTEMP;
> + ext_thermister = 1;
> + }
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "li_ion_9100", &pval);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing property li_ion_9100\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_dev_mem;
> + }
> + lion_battery = 0;
> + if (pval == 1) {
> + bat->no_maintenance = true;
> + bat->chg_unknown_bat = true;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].charge_full_design = 2600;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].termination_vol = 4150;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].recharge_vol = 4130;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].normal_cur_lvl = 520;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].normal_vol_lvl = 4200;
> + lion_battery = 1;
> + }
> + /* select the battery resolution table */
> + for (i = 0; i < bat->n_btypes; ++i) {
> + btype = (bat->bat_type + i);
> + if (ext_thermister) {
> + btype->batres_tbl =
> + temp_to_batres_tbl_ext_thermister;
> + } else if (lion_battery) {
> + btype->batres_tbl =
> + temp_to_batres_tbl_9100;
> + } else {
> + btype->batres_tbl =
> + temp_to_batres_tbl_thermister;
> + }
> + }
> + return ret;
> +free_dev_mem:
> + devm_kfree(dev, fg->supplied_to);
> +inval_pval:
> + return ret;
> +}
Since when fg_of_probe() fails, the driver probe function returns error,
there is no need to devm_kfree() data allocated with devm_kzalloc(), so
you can get rid of the goto statements
> static int __devinit ab8500_fg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int i, irq;
> int ret = 0;
> struct abx500_bm_plat_data *plat_data = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct ab8500_fg *di;
>
> + di = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*di), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!di) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s no mem for ab8500_btemp\n", __func__);
Copy&paste error, this is not btemp
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_no_mem;
> + }
> + if (np) {
> + if (!plat_data) {
> + plat_data =
> + devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*plat_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!plat_data) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "%s no mem for plat_data\n", __func__);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_device_info;
> + }
> + plat_data->fg = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(*plat_data->fg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!plat_data->fg) {
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, plat_data);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "%s no mem for pdata->fg\n",
> + __func__);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_device_info;
> + }
> + }
> + /* get battery specific platform data */
> + ret = fg_of_probe(&pdev->dev, np, plat_data);
> + if (ret) {
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, plat_data->fg);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, plat_data);
> + goto free_device_info;
> + }
> + }
> if (!plat_data) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "%s no fg platform data found\n", __func__);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_device_info;
> }
>
> di = kzalloc(sizeof(*di), GFP_KERNEL);
This should be removed, and kfree(di) should be removed from
ab8500_fg_remove()
> @@ -2606,11 +2737,17 @@ free_irq:
> free_inst_curr_wq:
> destroy_workqueue(di->fg_wq);
> free_device_info:
> - kfree(di);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, di);
> +err_no_mem:
>
> return ret;
> }
Also in this function, no need to call devm_kfree() on error
Regards,
Francesco
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@gmail.com>
To: Rajanikanth HV <rajanikanth.hv@linaro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
"Rajanikanth H.V" <rajanikanth.hv@stericsson.com>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500 fg
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:50:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50545D5D.6010101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB4BAkvdwEDViLGXfHHzYjkoL6qPZca2dzOin3GhBrqRJ3xNAg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 09/10/2012 11:44 AM, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
...
> +static int __devinit
> +fg_of_probe(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *np,
> + struct abx500_bm_plat_data *bm_pdata)
> +{
> + u8 val;
> + u32 pval;
> + int i;
> + int ext_thermister, lion_battery, ret = 0;
> + const char *bm_dev_name;
> + struct abx500_fg_platform_data *fg = bm_pdata->fg;
> + struct abx500_bm_data *bat;
> + struct abx500_battery_type *btype;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num_supplicants", &pval);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing property num_supplicants\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto inval_pval;
> + }
> + fg->num_supplicants = pval;
> + fg->supplied_to =
> + devm_kzalloc(dev, fg->num_supplicants *
> + sizeof(const char *), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (fg->supplied_to == NULL) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s no mem for supplied_to\n", __func__);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto inval_pval;
> + }
> + for (val = 0; val < fg->num_supplicants; ++val)
> + if (of_property_read_string_index
> + (np, "supplied_to", val, &bm_dev_name) == 0)
> + *(fg->supplied_to + val) = (char *)bm_dev_name;
> + else {
> + dev_err(dev, "insufficient number of supplied_to data found\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_dev_mem;
> + }
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "thermister_on_batctrl", &pval);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing property thermister_on_batctrl\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_dev_mem;
> + }
> + bm_pdata->battery = &ab8500_bm_data;
> + bat = bm_pdata->battery;
> + ext_thermister = 0;
> + if (pval == 0) {
> + bat->n_btypes = 4;
> + bat->bat_type = bat_type_ext_thermister;
> + bat->adc_therm = ABx500_ADC_THERM_BATTEMP;
> + ext_thermister = 1;
> + }
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "li_ion_9100", &pval);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "missing property li_ion_9100\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_dev_mem;
> + }
> + lion_battery = 0;
> + if (pval == 1) {
> + bat->no_maintenance = true;
> + bat->chg_unknown_bat = true;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].charge_full_design = 2600;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].termination_vol = 4150;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].recharge_vol = 4130;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].normal_cur_lvl = 520;
> + bat->bat_type[BATTERY_UNKNOWN].normal_vol_lvl = 4200;
> + lion_battery = 1;
> + }
> + /* select the battery resolution table */
> + for (i = 0; i < bat->n_btypes; ++i) {
> + btype = (bat->bat_type + i);
> + if (ext_thermister) {
> + btype->batres_tbl =
> + temp_to_batres_tbl_ext_thermister;
> + } else if (lion_battery) {
> + btype->batres_tbl =
> + temp_to_batres_tbl_9100;
> + } else {
> + btype->batres_tbl =
> + temp_to_batres_tbl_thermister;
> + }
> + }
> + return ret;
> +free_dev_mem:
> + devm_kfree(dev, fg->supplied_to);
> +inval_pval:
> + return ret;
> +}
Since when fg_of_probe() fails, the driver probe function returns error,
there is no need to devm_kfree() data allocated with devm_kzalloc(), so
you can get rid of the goto statements
> static int __devinit ab8500_fg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int i, irq;
> int ret = 0;
> struct abx500_bm_plat_data *plat_data = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct ab8500_fg *di;
>
> + di = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*di), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!di) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s no mem for ab8500_btemp\n", __func__);
Copy&paste error, this is not btemp
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_no_mem;
> + }
> + if (np) {
> + if (!plat_data) {
> + plat_data =
> + devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*plat_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!plat_data) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "%s no mem for plat_data\n", __func__);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_device_info;
> + }
> + plat_data->fg = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> + sizeof(*plat_data->fg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!plat_data->fg) {
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, plat_data);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "%s no mem for pdata->fg\n",
> + __func__);
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto free_device_info;
> + }
> + }
> + /* get battery specific platform data */
> + ret = fg_of_probe(&pdev->dev, np, plat_data);
> + if (ret) {
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, plat_data->fg);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, plat_data);
> + goto free_device_info;
> + }
> + }
> if (!plat_data) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "%s no fg platform data found\n", __func__);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto free_device_info;
> }
>
> di = kzalloc(sizeof(*di), GFP_KERNEL);
This should be removed, and kfree(di) should be removed from
ab8500_fg_remove()
> @@ -2606,11 +2737,17 @@ free_irq:
> free_inst_curr_wq:
> destroy_workqueue(di->fg_wq);
> free_device_info:
> - kfree(di);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, di);
> +err_no_mem:
>
> return ret;
> }
Also in this function, no need to call devm_kfree() on error
Regards,
Francesco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-15 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-10 9:44 [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500 fg Rajanikanth HV
2012-09-10 9:44 ` Rajanikanth HV
2012-09-10 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-10 14:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-09-15 10:50 ` Francesco Lavra [this message]
2012-09-15 10:50 ` Francesco Lavra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-24 6:01 Rajanikanth H.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50545D5D.6010101@gmail.com \
--to=francescolavra.fl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.