From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@mellanox.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: mlx4: dropping multicast packets at promisc leave
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:04:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505B3088.7090908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505B1874.3040904@mellanox.com>
On 09/20/2012 10:21 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On 20/09/2012 03:43, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
>> I have a report that our mlx4 driver (RHEL 6.3) is dropping multicast
>> packets when NIC leaves promisc mode. It seems this is being cause due
>> to the new steering mode that took place near by commit
>> 1679200f91da6a054b06954c9bd3eeed29b6731f. As it seems, the new
>> steering mode needs more commands/time to leave the promisc mode,
>> which may be leading to packet drops.
>
> Marcelo,
>
> The commit you point on below 6d19993 "net/mlx4_en: Re-design multicast
> attachments flow" makes sure to avoid
> doing extra firmware comments and not leave a window in time where
> "correct" addresses are not attached. Its hard to say what's the case on
> that RHEL 6.3 system, it would be very helpful through if you manage to
> reproduce the problem on an upstream kernel -- BTW you didn't say on
Okay, I understand that the commit prevents a window. I may be missing
something, but isn't there another one in there? Between:
mlx4_SET_MCAST_FLTR MLX4_MCAST_DISABLE and
mlx4_SET_MCAST_FLTR MLX4_MCAST_ENABLE
because mlx4_multicast_promisc_remove() was called just before those.
Otherwise I don't how is the NIC would be receiving multicast packets in
there.
I understand the difficulty about the kernel version, I am sorry for
that. As I'm unable to reproduce the issue by myself, I couldn't run a
test in a plain upstream kernel so far or experiment much.
I was holding this email: I just access to a server that seems to
reproduce the issue. It has a MT27500 ConnectX-3 NIC. Only tried our
RHEL 6.3 stock so far. Keep you posted on further tests!
This was the result of ifconfig mlx4_2 -promisc:
[ 3] 34.0-35.0 sec 61.7 MBytes 517 Mbits/sec 0.024 ms 274/43502
(0.63%)
[ 3] 34.0-35.0 sec 756 datagrams received out-of-order
> which kernel you are trying to reproduce this, note that upstream has
> also commit 60d31c1475f2 "net/mlx4_core: Looking for promiscuous entries
> on the correct port" (reported by you...) , so if somehow this commit
> makes the diff you could use it also on their system.
Sorry, that would be 2.6.32-279.el6. It has additional commits up to
somewhere near commit
58a3de0 - mlx4_core: fix race on comm channel
but maybe not all before that one. Can't tell you for sure.
And then I tried 3 additional patches applied at once:
- 60d31c1475f2 "net/mlx4_core: Looking for promiscuous entries on the
correct port"
- f1f75f0 - mlx4: attach multicast with correct flag
- Yes, this one wasn't in 2.6.32-279.el6.
- 6d19993 - net/mlx4_en: Re-design multicast attachments flow
And they still reported drops.
>> It takes 300ms to perform the change there against my 600us. Hitting
>> something like tcpdump -c 10 in a loop helps triggering it.
>
> Do you have any insight for this huge difference?
No idea. Couldn't track it yet.
Thanks,
Marcelo.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-20 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 0:43 mlx4: dropping multicast packets at promisc leave Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2012-09-20 13:21 ` Or Gerlitz
2012-09-20 15:04 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2012-09-21 18:32 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2012-09-27 20:37 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2012-09-27 20:45 ` Or Gerlitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505B3088.7090908@redhat.com \
--to=mleitner@redhat.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=yevgenyp@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.