From: Don Slutz <Don@CloudSwitch.Com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <imammedo@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] target-i386: Fix default Hypervisor level for hypervisor-vendor=kvm.
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:28:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505CDBFB.9060605@CloudSwitch.Com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120921204920.GD3983@otherpad.lan.raisama.net>
On 09/21/12 16:49, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:26:58PM -0400, Don Slutz wrote:
>> On 09/21/12 10:18, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:06:27PM -0400, Don Slutz wrote:
>>>> From http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1205.0/00100.html
>>>> EAX should be KVM_CPUID_FEATURES (0x40000001) not 0.
>>>>
>>>> Added hypervisor-vendor=kvm0 to get the older CPUID result. kvm1 selects the newer one.
>>> Why not just make "hypervisor-vendor=kvm" control only the hypervisor
>>> vendor string, and support something like "kvm-hypervisor-level=0" to
>>> restore the old cpuid_hv_level=0 behavior?
>> -cpu host,hypervisor-vendor=kvm,hypervisor-level=0
>>
>> Does this.
> Good. :-)
>
>>> This is similar to the kvmclock case: it would allow us to make
>>> "hypervisor-vendor=kvm" use saner values as default, but letting old
>>> machine-types to override it for compatibility if required.
>> Right now since I am using env->cpuid_hv_level == 0 as a flag. This
>> means that:
>>
>> -cpu host,hypervisor-level=0,hypervisor-vendor=kvm
>>
>> -cpu host,hypervisor-vendor=kvm,hypervisor-level=0
>>
>> end up with different CPUID data (Which I do not like). I will fix this in the next round.
> Right. This has to be fixed.
>
>> Did you want me to drop kvm0 and kvm1?
> Yes, if level is already configurable using the hypervisor-level
> property, I don't see the need for kvm0 and kvm1.
>
> If you make kvm_arch_init_vcpu() actually use those fields, you will end
> up implementing what's required to allow migration compatibility to be
> kept (the only thing missing is to make the CPU class a child of
> DeviceState, and add hypervisor-level=0 to the existing machine-types).
> :-)
>
You mean like
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-09/msg03402.html
and
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-09/msg03405.html
already change kvm_arch_init_vcpu(). I did not know that I need to make
the CPU class a child of DeviceState.
Nor that I needed to add hypervisor-vendor=kvm,hypervisor-level=0 to the
existing machine-types. Since without specifying hypervisor-level=0 it
defaults to 0 and kvm_arch_init_vcpu() will default to setting
hypervisor-vendor=kvm.
-Don
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Don Slutz <Don@CloudSwitch.Com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] target-i386: Fix default Hypervisor level for hypervisor-vendor=kvm.
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:28:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505CDBFB.9060605@CloudSwitch.Com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120921204920.GD3983@otherpad.lan.raisama.net>
On 09/21/12 16:49, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:26:58PM -0400, Don Slutz wrote:
>> On 09/21/12 10:18, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:06:27PM -0400, Don Slutz wrote:
>>>> From http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1205.0/00100.html
>>>> EAX should be KVM_CPUID_FEATURES (0x40000001) not 0.
>>>>
>>>> Added hypervisor-vendor=kvm0 to get the older CPUID result. kvm1 selects the newer one.
>>> Why not just make "hypervisor-vendor=kvm" control only the hypervisor
>>> vendor string, and support something like "kvm-hypervisor-level=0" to
>>> restore the old cpuid_hv_level=0 behavior?
>> -cpu host,hypervisor-vendor=kvm,hypervisor-level=0
>>
>> Does this.
> Good. :-)
>
>>> This is similar to the kvmclock case: it would allow us to make
>>> "hypervisor-vendor=kvm" use saner values as default, but letting old
>>> machine-types to override it for compatibility if required.
>> Right now since I am using env->cpuid_hv_level == 0 as a flag. This
>> means that:
>>
>> -cpu host,hypervisor-level=0,hypervisor-vendor=kvm
>>
>> -cpu host,hypervisor-vendor=kvm,hypervisor-level=0
>>
>> end up with different CPUID data (Which I do not like). I will fix this in the next round.
> Right. This has to be fixed.
>
>> Did you want me to drop kvm0 and kvm1?
> Yes, if level is already configurable using the hypervisor-level
> property, I don't see the need for kvm0 and kvm1.
>
> If you make kvm_arch_init_vcpu() actually use those fields, you will end
> up implementing what's required to allow migration compatibility to be
> kept (the only thing missing is to make the CPU class a child of
> DeviceState, and add hypervisor-level=0 to the existing machine-types).
> :-)
>
You mean like
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-09/msg03402.html
and
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-09/msg03405.html
already change kvm_arch_init_vcpu(). I did not know that I need to make
the CPU class a child of DeviceState.
Nor that I needed to add hypervisor-vendor=kvm,hypervisor-level=0 to the
existing machine-types. Since without specifying hypervisor-level=0 it
defaults to 0 and kvm_arch_init_vcpu() will default to setting
hypervisor-vendor=kvm.
-Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-20 20:06 [PATCH v2 0/1] target-i386: Fix default Hypervisor level for kvm Don Slutz
2012-09-20 20:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Don Slutz
2012-09-20 20:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] target-i386: Fix default Hypervisor level for hypervisor-vendor=kvm Don Slutz
2012-09-20 20:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Don Slutz
2012-09-21 14:18 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-09-21 14:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2012-09-21 20:26 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-21 20:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Don Slutz
2012-09-21 20:49 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-09-21 20:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2012-09-21 21:28 ` Don Slutz [this message]
2012-09-21 21:28 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-21 21:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-09-21 21:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2012-09-22 3:26 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-22 3:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Don Slutz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505CDBFB.9060605@CloudSwitch.Com \
--to=don@cloudswitch.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.