From: Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:16:11 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505D9DFB.8080002@westnet.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120921183934.GK13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On 09/22/2012 04:39 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
>> Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread
>> branch.
>>
>> Mark Salter (3):
>> c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread()
>> c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve
>> c6x: switch to generic sys_execve
>
> Applied and pushed...
>
> FWIW, the current status:
>
> alpha - done, tested on hardware
> arm - done, tested on qemu
> c6x - done by maintainer
> frv - done, untested
> m68k - done, tested on aranym; there's a known issue in copy_thread() in
> case of coldfire-MMU, presumably to be handled in m68k tree (I can do it
> in this one instead, if m68k folks would prefer it that way)
I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
if you would rather take it with your changes.
Regards
Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-22 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 18:20 [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-07 18:22 ` Al Viro
2012-09-10 13:40 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-10 16:49 ` Al Viro
2012-09-11 3:39 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-13 13:27 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-13 13:27 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-10 22:20 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-10 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] c6x: implement ret_from_kernel_execve() and switch to generic kernel_execve() Mark Salter
2012-09-10 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] c6x: switch to generic sys_execve() Mark Salter
2012-09-17 3:26 ` [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-21 16:26 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread() Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] c6x: switch to generic sys_execve Mark Salter
2012-09-21 18:39 ` [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-22 11:16 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2012-09-23 0:46 ` Al Viro
2012-09-24 10:59 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-24 10:59 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-17 9:29 ` Michal Simek
2012-09-17 22:57 ` Al Viro
2012-09-19 12:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-19 12:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-19 13:32 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505D9DFB.8080002@westnet.com.au \
--to=gregungerer@westnet.com.au \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.