From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:29:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50603D02.50302@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120923004636.GL13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sunday 23 September 2012 06:16 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:16:11PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
>>
>> I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
>> if you would rather take it with your changes.
>
> Applied. Other changes since the last update:
> * ppc breakage debugged and fixed
> * kernel_thread() unified on all converted architectures.
commit cc615abcde (mn10300: convert to generic kernel_thread) in the
experimental-kernel_thread has a minor syntactical error:
diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
index 26120a9..8ee09d8 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags,
p->thread.usp = c_usp;
if (unlikely(!kregs)) {
- memset(c_regs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs);
+ memset(c_regs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
Thx,
-Vineet
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gregungerer@westnet.com.au>,
Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:29:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50603D02.50302@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120923004636.GL13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sunday 23 September 2012 06:16 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 09:16:11PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2
>>
>> I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
>> if you would rather take it with your changes.
>
> Applied. Other changes since the last update:
> * ppc breakage debugged and fixed
> * kernel_thread() unified on all converted architectures.
commit cc615abcde (mn10300: convert to generic kernel_thread) in the
experimental-kernel_thread has a minor syntactical error:
diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
index 26120a9..8ee09d8 100644
--- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags,
p->thread.usp = c_usp;
if (unlikely(!kregs)) {
- memset(c_regs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs);
+ memset(c_regs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
Thx,
-Vineet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 18:20 [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-07 18:22 ` Al Viro
2012-09-10 13:40 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-10 16:49 ` Al Viro
2012-09-11 3:39 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-13 13:27 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-13 13:27 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-10 22:20 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-10 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] c6x: implement ret_from_kernel_execve() and switch to generic kernel_execve() Mark Salter
2012-09-10 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] c6x: switch to generic sys_execve() Mark Salter
2012-09-17 3:26 ` [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-21 16:26 ` Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread() Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve Mark Salter
2012-09-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] c6x: switch to generic sys_execve Mark Salter
2012-09-21 18:39 ` [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited Al Viro
2012-09-22 11:16 ` Greg Ungerer
2012-09-23 0:46 ` Al Viro
2012-09-24 10:59 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2012-09-24 10:59 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-17 9:29 ` Michal Simek
2012-09-17 22:57 ` Al Viro
2012-09-19 12:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-19 12:20 ` Vineet Gupta
2012-09-19 13:32 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50603D02.50302@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregungerer@westnet.com.au \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.