From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: al viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "__d_unalias() should refuse to move mountpoints"
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:04:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506173A6.2050705@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8db34325-e8e4-4e24-85dd-c8951769e2b6@email.android.com>
Hey,
Op 25-09-12 09:05, Eric W. Biederman schreef:
> Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Op 25-09-12 05:39, Eric W. Biederman schreef:
>>> Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> This reverts commit ee3efa91e240f513898050ef305a49a653c8ed90.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
>>>>
>>>> My thread about the regression seemed to have been ignored, so I can
>> only
>>>> conclude nobody objects against a full revert of this patch.
>>>>
>>>> My testcase is simply booting through netboot with / and ~/nfs as
>> separate
>>>> nfs filesystems, then doing 'ls ~/nfs' followed by 'ls ~' in a
>> gnome-terminal
>>>> window, then I get:
>>> Do I read your description correctly: Without using a bind mount you
>>> have the same nfs filesystem mounted on / and on ~/nfs?
>>>
>>> Something is definitely off with your configuration but if to work
>> you
>>> need to move mount points around then that something seems much
>> deeper
>>> than the __d_unalias change.
>>>
>>> What filesystems do you have mounted where?
>>>
>> / is a nfs filesystem, ~/nfs is a different nfs filesystem.
> Are both filesystems on the same server?
>
> Are the two filesystems distinct filesystem on the server?
>
> Unless there is duplication of something somewhere the d_unalias code should not trigger.
They're both on the same physical filesystem on the server, but unique exports:
/home/mlankhorst/nfs *(no_subtree_check,insecure,rw,all_squash,anonuid=1000,anongid=1000)
/home/mlankhorst/kvm/quantal-amd64 *(no_subtree_check,insecure,rw,no_root_squash)
Rootfs is mounted by the kernel itself, I used a custom init script to mount /lib/modules
early on:
mount -t nfs -o nolock,vers=3 192.168.1.128:/home/mlankhorst/nfs /home/mlankhorst/nfs &&
mkdir -p /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel &&
mount --bind /home/mlankhorst/nfs/linux /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel &&
([ -f /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/modules.symbols ] || depmod)
exec /sbin/init
>> Just doing
>> ls / is enough
>> to make all filesystems mounted on / return -EBUSY and disappear.
>>
>> I also have a subdir of ~/nfs/ bind mounted to /lib/modules/$(uname
>> -r)/kernel
>> for easy debugging so just doing 'make' in the kernel tree is enough to
>> get the
>> new modules + bzImage, but I don't know if it is a factor in
>> reproducing this bug
>> or not.
> Unlikely. But interesting. It at least fits the criteria of showing up to different places. It should not be enough for d_materialise uniqe.
>
Either way until the root cause is found could this patch be reverted?
~Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-24 17:45 [PATCH] Revert "__d_unalias() should refuse to move mountpoints" Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25 3:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25 6:42 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25 7:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25 9:04 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2012-09-25 10:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25 11:03 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25 11:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25 11:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-10-12 13:25 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-29 20:06 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 20:53 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 21:30 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 22:09 ` Al Viro
2012-12-04 10:33 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-12-04 10:37 ` Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506173A6.2050705@canonical.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.