All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: al viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "__d_unalias() should refuse to move mountpoints"
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:03:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50618F96.1020204@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ipb2pemt.fsf@xmission.com>

Op 25-09-12 12:42, Eric W. Biederman schreef:
> Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> writes:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Op 25-09-12 09:05, Eric W. Biederman schreef:
>>> Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> Op 25-09-12 05:39, Eric W. Biederman schreef:
>>>>> Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This reverts commit ee3efa91e240f513898050ef305a49a653c8ed90.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My thread about the regression seemed to have been ignored, so I can
>>>> only
>>>>>> conclude nobody objects against a full revert of this patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My testcase is simply booting through netboot with / and ~/nfs as
>>>> separate
>>>>>> nfs filesystems, then doing 'ls ~/nfs' followed by 'ls ~' in a
>>>> gnome-terminal
>>>>>> window, then I get:
>>>>> Do I read your description correctly:  Without using a bind mount you
>>>>> have the same nfs filesystem mounted on / and on ~/nfs?
>>>>>
>>>>> Something is definitely off with your configuration but if to work
>>>> you
>>>>> need to move mount points around then that something seems much
>>>> deeper
>>>>> than the __d_unalias change.
>>>>>
>>>>> What filesystems do you have mounted where?
>>>>>
>>>> / is a nfs filesystem, ~/nfs is a different nfs filesystem.
>>> Are both filesystems on the same server?
>>>
>>> Are the two filesystems distinct filesystem on the server?
>>>
>>> Unless there is duplication of something somewhere the d_unalias code should not trigger.
>> They're both on the same physical filesystem on the server, but unique exports:
>> /home/mlankhorst/nfs *(no_subtree_check,insecure,rw,all_squash,anonuid=1000,anongid=1000)
>> /home/mlankhorst/kvm/quantal-amd64 *(no_subtree_check,insecure,rw,no_root_squash)
> Modern NFS does some interesting things with disconnected roots and the
> like.  I don't think it should be connecting those two filesytems
> together because there are no overlapping directories.
>
> I really don't get why using one filesystem causes confusion in the other.
>
>> Rootfs is mounted by the kernel itself, I used a custom init script to mount /lib/modules
>> early on:
>>
>> mount -t nfs -o nolock,vers=3 192.168.1.128:/home/mlankhorst/nfs /home/mlankhorst/nfs &&
>> mkdir -p /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel &&
>> mount --bind /home/mlankhorst/nfs/linux /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel &&
>> ([ -f /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/modules.symbols ] || depmod)
>>
>> exec /sbin/init
> Could you try the following patch?  This should report what directories
> cannot be renamed because one of them is a mount point and it gives some
> real insight into what is going on.

ls /
__d_unalias: /dev -> /dev
__d_unalias: /proc -> /proc
__d_unalias: /sys -> /sys

Backtrace with WARN_ON_ONCE on the if check, unsurprisingly __d_unalias was inlined:
WARNING: at fs/dcache.c:2407 d_materialise_unique+0x3ee/0x490()
Hardware name: 1215N
Modules linked in: snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq parport_pc snd_timer snd_seq_device arc4 nouveau ppdev snd eeepc_wmi parport ath9k asus_wmi ttm mac80211 mxm_wmi i915 ath9k_common ath9k_hw drm_kms_helper drm ath soundcore cfg80211 snd_page_alloc video nfsd
Pid: 1452, comm: ls Not tainted 3.6.0-rc4-patser+ #175
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8104907a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
 [<ffffffff810490c5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
 [<ffffffff8117d52e>] d_materialise_unique+0x3ee/0x490
 [<ffffffff812477cb>] ? nfs_fhget+0x4db/0x5a0
 [<ffffffff81242b00>] nfs_lookup+0x130/0x190
 [<ffffffff8116ff68>] lookup_real+0x18/0x50
 [<ffffffff811704e3>] __lookup_hash+0x33/0x40
 [<ffffffff81708153>] lookup_slow+0x44/0xa8
 [<ffffffff81172806>] path_lookupat+0x236/0x7e0
 [<ffffffff81170702>] ? getname_flags+0x32/0x100
 [<ffffffff8115870c>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xdc/0x260
 [<ffffffff81170702>] ? getname_flags+0x32/0x100
 [<ffffffff81172ddc>] do_path_lookup+0x2c/0xc0
 [<ffffffff81175a14>] user_path_at_empty+0x54/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81076f0d>] ? lg_local_unlock+0x3d/0x70
 [<ffffffff8116a1a1>] ? cp_new_stat+0x111/0x130
 [<ffffffff81175a6c>] user_path_at+0xc/0x10
 [<ffffffff8116a3b5>] vfs_fstatat+0x35/0x60
 [<ffffffff8116a3f9>] vfs_lstat+0x19/0x20
 [<ffffffff8116a555>] sys_newlstat+0x15/0x30
 [<ffffffff813924ce>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff817191a2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

~Maarten

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-25 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-24 17:45 [PATCH] Revert "__d_unalias() should refuse to move mountpoints" Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25  3:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25  6:42   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25  7:05     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25  9:04       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-09-25 10:42         ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25 11:03           ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2012-09-25 11:29             ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-25 11:59               ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-10-12 13:25               ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-11-29 20:06               ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 20:53                 ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 21:30                   ` Al Viro
2012-11-29 22:09                     ` Al Viro
2012-12-04 10:33                 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2012-12-04 10:37                   ` Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50618F96.1020204@canonical.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.