From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hot-added cpu is not asiggned to the correct node
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:33:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50624D5F.9050008@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120924093312.GC28937@mwanda>
Hi Dan,
At first, thank you for your comment.
2012/09/24 18:33, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:33:11PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> When I hot-added CPUs and memories simultaneously using container driver,
>> all the hot-added CPUs were mistakenly assigned to node0.
>>
>
> Is this something which used to work correctly? If so which was the
> most recent working kernel?
The cpu hot-adding is first time on my x86 box. So I don't know
whether old kernel can work well or not. But it seems that x86
does not permit to create memory-less-node. So I guess the problem
occurs on old kernel.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hot-added cpu is not asiggned to the correct node
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:33:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50624D5F.9050008@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120924093312.GC28937@mwanda>
Hi Dan,
At first, thank you for your comment.
2012/09/24 18:33, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:33:11PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>> When I hot-added CPUs and memories simultaneously using container driver,
>> all the hot-added CPUs were mistakenly assigned to node0.
>>
>
> Is this something which used to work correctly? If so which was the
> most recent working kernel?
The cpu hot-adding is first time on my x86 box. So I don't know
whether old kernel can work well or not. But it seems that x86
does not permit to create memory-less-node. So I guess the problem
occurs on old kernel.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-26 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 5:33 hot-added cpu is not asiggned to the correct node Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-09-12 5:33 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-09-24 9:33 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-24 9:33 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-09-26 0:33 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2012-09-26 0:33 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-10 8:00 ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-10 8:00 ` Wen Congyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50624D5F.9050008@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.